Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Datajson Validator Documentation #123

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Oct 7, 2022
Merged

Conversation

nickumia-reisys
Copy link

Related to:

Changes:

  • Simplify README
  • Add Plugin-specific documentation to docs/ folder
  • Fix test file pointers in tests

nickumia-reisys and others added 5 commits October 6, 2022 20:54
- Make note of new plugin `datajson_validator`
- Remove ancient nosetest stuff
- Remove ancient legacy environment stuff
- Remove ancient paster stuff
more plugin specific docs to individual files
@nickumia-reisys nickumia-reisys requested a review from a team October 7, 2022 01:29
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 7, 2022

✅ Result of Pytest Coverage

---------- coverage: platform linux, python 3.8.10-final-0 -----------

Name Stmts Miss Cover
ckanext/datajson/init.py 6 6 0%
ckanext/datajson/blueprint.py 222 46 79%
ckanext/datajson/datajson.py 436 113 74%
ckanext/datajson/datajsonvalidator.py 71 71 0%
ckanext/datajson/exceptions.py 2 0 100%
ckanext/datajson/harvester_base.py 3 0 100%
ckanext/datajson/harvester_cmsdatanavigator.py 63 63 0%
ckanext/datajson/harvester_datajson.py 49 13 73%
ckanext/datajson/helpers.py 111 43 61%
ckanext/datajson/package2pod.py 302 164 46%
ckanext/datajson/parse_datajson.py 105 32 70%
ckanext/datajson/plugin.py 34 1 97%
TOTAL 1404 552 61%
Required test coverage of
================== 34 passed, 3933

@nickumia-reisys nickumia-reisys merged commit 35296cc into main Oct 7, 2022
@nickumia-reisys nickumia-reisys deleted the datajson-validator-docs branch October 7, 2022 13:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants