Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

gfk sensic domains #709

Closed
wants to merge 20 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

dimitarandonov
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link

The RWS JSON was not successfully validated. Here are your results:
This primary is already registered in another related website set: https://sensics.org
These associated sites are already registered in another related website set: {'https://sensic.net'}
Encountered an inequality between the PR submission and the /.well-known/related-website-set.json file:
associatedSites was ['https://sensics.org'] in the PR, and [] in the well-known.
Diff was: ['https://sensics.org'].
Encountered an inequality between the PR submission and the /.well-known/related-website-set.json file:
serviceSites was [] in the PR, and ['https://development.sensic-demo.gfk.com'] in the well-known.
Diff was: ['https://development.sensic-demo.gfk.com'].
The listed associated site did not have https://sensic.net listed as its primary: https://sensics.org
Encountered an inequality between the PR submission and the /.well-known/related-website-set.json file:
associatedSites was ['https://sensic.net'] in the PR, and [] in the well-known.
Diff was: ['https://sensic.net'].
Encountered an inequality between the PR submission and the /.well-known/related-website-set.json file:
serviceSites was [] in the PR, and ['https://sensic.net'] in the well-known.
Diff was: ['https://sensic.net'].
The listed associated site did not have https://sensics.org listed as its primary: https://sensic.net

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants