Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Better deal with vocaularies #174

Open
stevieflow opened this issue Aug 6, 2014 · 2 comments
Open

Better deal with vocaularies #174

stevieflow opened this issue Aug 6, 2014 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement
Milestone
Iteration 3

Comments

@stevieflow
Copy link
Contributor

Take a look at http://dev.dashboard.iatistandard.org/publisher/scuk.html

The 33 codes that are not on the codelist are because they are using RO as a vocab.

Any idea how we mitigate for this?
@Bjwebb Bjwebb added this to the Iteration 3 milestone Aug 6, 2014
@Bjwebb
Copy link
Contributor

Bjwebb commented Aug 6, 2014

We can mitigate this by treating codelists distinctly depending on what vocabulary is specified.

@Bjwebb Bjwebb mentioned this issue Oct 29, 2014
Closed
@Bjwebb Bjwebb removed their assignment Nov 18, 2014
@Bjwebb Bjwebb mentioned this issue Nov 29, 2014
Closed
@Bjwebb Bjwebb mentioned this issue Feb 25, 2015
Closed
@hayfield hayfield changed the title Codes - when using RO vocab Better deal with vocaularies Sep 25, 2017
This was referenced Jul 20, 2018
Closed
Closed
@andylolz
Copy link
Contributor

In case anyone arrives here having clicked through from one of the yellow notices on the IATI dashboard: I’ve sent a fix for this issue (#505; IATI/IATI-Stats#135), which is awaiting review by the IATI secretariat technical team.

@stevieflow stevieflow mentioned this issue Nov 19, 2019
Open
@andylolz andylolz mentioned this issue Nov 23, 2019
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement
Projects
None yet
Milestone
Iteration 3
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@Bjwebb @andylolz @hayfield @stevieflow