Skip to content

Issues: IETF-OPSAWG-WG/draft-ietf-opsawg-pcap

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

36 Open 33 Closed
36 Open 33 Closed
Author
Filter by author
Loading
Label
Filter by label
Loading
Use alt + click/return to exclude labels
or ⇧ + click/return for logical OR
Projects
Filter by project
Loading
Milestones
Filter by milestone
Loading
Assignee
Filter by who’s assigned
Sort
Sort by
Newest Oldest Most commented Least commented Recently updated Least recently updated Best match
Most reactions
👍 👎 😄 🎉 😕 ❤️ 🚀 👀

Issues list

Add information to associate packets with processes
#164 opened Oct 25, 2024 by prakharPant
5
Should the pcap specification's Security Considerations section pick up the considerations from the Media-Type registration?
#156 opened Jun 2, 2024 by guyharris
Media type registration for pcapng
#155 opened May 27, 2024 by johnthacker
7
Any reason to use octet and byte? consistency?
#149 opened Dec 26, 2023 by fxlb
5
write designated expert guidance for linktypes
#136 opened Jul 26, 2023 by mcr
1
re-synchronize linktypes and document at WGLC
#135 opened Jul 26, 2023 by mcr
@mcr
Physical layer packet type differentation
#129 opened Apr 29, 2023 by alexforencich
1
should we reserve a bit in BLOCK TYPES for do-not-copy?
#126 opened Jan 25, 2023 by mcr
The length of Custom Block's Custom Data?
#125 opened Nov 25, 2022 by winking324
4
Is there any need to do CircleCI testing?
#113 opened Mar 5, 2022 by guyharris
2
Proposal to facilitate localization pcapv3 aka pcapng
#109 opened Sep 23, 2021 by SxN02
3
Pcapng Clarification question - is end of option need to be when there are no options pcapv3 aka pcapng
#108 opened Jul 8, 2021 by rluvaton
4
question how to timestamp end of packet pcapv3 aka pcapng
#61 opened Apr 5, 2019 by horsth
2
Is the if_fcslen option in the Interface Description Block in units of bits or bytes? pcapv3 aka pcapng
#60 opened Mar 3, 2019 by guyharris
6
Some issues with the Interface Statistics Block pcapv3 aka pcapng
#58 opened Feb 14, 2019 by guyharris
Custom link-layer types, similar to custom blocks and options pcapv3 aka pcapng
#52 opened Aug 10, 2018 by guyharris
1
Proposal: Additional option fields for wireless packet capture pcapv3 aka pcapng
#48 opened Nov 13, 2017 by ryankurte
50
Comments on 5. Experimental Blocks - please drop/deprecate
#47 opened Nov 22, 2016 by erik4711
@mcr
2
Comments on 4.6. Interface Statistics Block - please deprecate pcapv3 aka pcapng
#46 opened Nov 22, 2016 by erik4711
Comments on 4.4. Simple Packet Block - please deprecate pcapv3 aka pcapng
#45 opened Nov 22, 2016 by erik4711
Comments on 4.3. Enhanced Packet Block - specify timestamps as a 64 bit vaule pcapv3 aka pcapng
#44 opened Nov 22, 2016 by erik4711
Comments on 4.2. Interface Description Block - SnapLen field can be removed pcapv3 aka pcapng
#43 opened Nov 22, 2016 by erik4711
Comments on 4.1. Section Header Block - don't allow multiple SHB's pcapv3 aka pcapng
#42 opened Nov 22, 2016 by erik4711
Comments on 3.1. General Block Structure - endian and padding pcapv3 aka pcapng
#41 opened Nov 22, 2016 by erik4711
14
Is it legal for an EPB capture length value to be different than snaplen/origlen? pcapv3 aka pcapng
#35 opened Aug 29, 2015 by hadrielk
7
ProTip! Type g p on any issue or pull request to go back to the pull request listing page.