✨Infra: Build for arm64

[sanderegg]

What do these changes do?

In order to run oSparc on ARM-based processors, this PR allows to build docker images for ARM64 processors
This is useful for cost reduction purposes.
re-used Makefile machinery used for building towards Raspberry Pi ARM architecture.

1st step shall run manually via triggering. next steps will follow in a separate PR.

some details:

• Dockerfile TARGETARCH variable contains the target architecture (automatically filled in by docker at build time) (see Dockerfile multi-architecture docs)
• Already adapted RClone installation

Bonuses:

• upgraded shellcheck to 0.10.0

Current workflow

• first create the usual amd64 image, and run all the tests as usual
• once this goes through and in master,

Currently will be run manually for testing purposes

• the arm64 images will be built (sadly for now with possibly slightly different libs as the build for arm64 happens at a different timepoint),
• the arm64 build is pushed to dockerhub,
• the arm64 and amd64 images are then "fused" as the registry is able to provide both architectures at the same time

Related issue/s

How to test

Dev-ops checklist

• No ENV changes or I properly updated ENV (read the instruction)

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 81.49%. Comparing base (9d5c8db) to head (1f7b717).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #6984      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   85.52%   81.49%   -4.03%     
==========================================
  Files        1630      120    -1510     
  Lines       64379     5070   -59309     
  Branches     2035        0    -2035     
==========================================
- Hits        55061     4132   -50929     
+ Misses       8984      938    -8046     
+ Partials      334        0     -334     

Flag	Coverage Δ
integrationtests	59.86% <ø> (-5.02%)	⬇️
unittests	88.18% <ø> (+4.37%)	⬆️

Components	Coverage Δ
api	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_aws_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_dask_task_models_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_models_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_notifications_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_postgres_database	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_service_integration	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_service_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_settings_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_simcore_sdk	∅ <ø> (∅)
agent	96.82% <ø> (ø)
api_server	∅ <ø> (∅)
autoscaling	∅ <ø> (∅)
catalog	∅ <ø> (∅)
clusters_keeper	∅ <ø> (∅)
dask_sidecar	∅ <ø> (∅)
datcore_adapter	∅ <ø> (∅)
director	∅ <ø> (∅)
director_v2	∅ <ø> (∅)
dynamic_scheduler	∅ <ø> (∅)
dynamic_sidecar	89.75% <ø> (ø)
efs_guardian	∅ <ø> (∅)
invitations	∅ <ø> (∅)
osparc_gateway_server	∅ <ø> (∅)
payments	∅ <ø> (∅)
resource_usage_tracker	∅ <ø> (∅)
storage	∅ <ø> (∅)
webclient	∅ <ø> (∅)
webserver	56.27% <ø> (-23.45%)	⬇️

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 9d5c8db...1f7b717. Read the comment docs.

[pcrespov]

i wonder whether we should also have some of those for development

[GitHK]

reassign when ready

[matusdrobuliak66]

👍

[pcrespov]

thx

[mrnicegyu11]

lgtm keep us in the loop on the progress, thx

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud