Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update dependency tailwind-merge to v3 #852

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Jan 30, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
tailwind-merge 2.6.0 -> 3.0.1 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

dcastil/tailwind-merge (tailwind-merge)

v3.0.1

Compare Source

v3.0.0

Compare Source


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

@renovate renovate bot requested a review from IgorKowalczyk January 30, 2025 19:00
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/tailwind-merge-3.x branch from e7dbe31 to 8923bbd Compare February 1, 2025 13:09
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/tailwind-merge-3.x branch from 8923bbd to 46b10e0 Compare February 1, 2025 13:17
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/tailwind-merge-3.x branch from 46b10e0 to e37c8fa Compare February 3, 2025 15:25
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/tailwind-merge-3.x branch from e37c8fa to 9bf27d2 Compare February 4, 2025 17:06
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/tailwind-merge-3.x branch from 9bf27d2 to 41105c5 Compare February 4, 2025 17:09
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/tailwind-merge-3.x branch from 41105c5 to 87ac8f1 Compare February 4, 2025 17:16
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/tailwind-merge-3.x branch from 87ac8f1 to 9de7ad3 Compare February 5, 2025 10:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants