Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Evaluate migrating the Operator based provisioners implementation from the deprecated packageManifest to alternative and supported formats #24

Open
fabiobrz opened this issue Apr 13, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Evaluate migrating the Operator based provisioners implementation from the deprecated packageManifest to alternative and supported formats #24

fabiobrz opened this issue Apr 13, 2023 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request triage This issue needs investigation to better define its scope and context

Comments

@fabiobrz
Copy link
Member

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

Operator based provisioners currently rely on the package manifest format, which is now deprecated and could disappear from OpenShift soon.

Describe the solution you'd like

We should evaluate whether Intersmash can support Operator based provisioning by relying a on a supported format, as the bundle format, see https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.12/operators/understanding/olm-packaging-format.html and https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.12/operators/operator_sdk/osdk-pkgman-to-bundle.html

Describe alternatives you've considered

Drop support for Operator based provisioning?

Additional context
N/A
@fabiobrz fabiobrz added the enhancement New feature or request label Apr 13, 2023
@fabiobrz fabiobrz mentioned this issue Apr 13, 2023
Closed
@fabiobrz fabiobrz added the triage This issue needs investigation to better define its scope and context label Feb 2, 2024
@dosubot dosubot bot added the stale Issue has not had recent activity or appears to be solved. Stale issues will be automatically closed label Sep 19, 2024
@fabiobrz fabiobrz removed the stale Issue has not had recent activity or appears to be solved. Stale issues will be automatically closed label Sep 20, 2024
@dosubot DosuBot
Copy link

dosubot bot commented Dec 20, 2024

Hi, @fabiobrz. I'm Dosu, and I'm helping the intersmash team manage their backlog. I'm marking this issue as stale.

Issue Summary:

  • The issue highlights the need to transition Operator based provisioners from the deprecated package manifest format to a supported format like bundle.
  • This change is necessary due to the upcoming removal of the package manifest format from OpenShift.
  • You proposed assessing the feasibility of this migration for Intersmash or possibly discontinuing support for Operator based provisioning.
  • There have been no further comments or activities on this issue.

Next Steps:

  • Please let us know if this issue is still relevant to the latest version of the intersmash repository by commenting on this issue.
  • If there is no further activity, the issue will be automatically closed in 30 days.

Thank you for your understanding and contribution!

@dosubot dosubot bot added the stale Issue has not had recent activity or appears to be solved. Stale issues will be automatically closed label Dec 20, 2024
@fabiobrz
Copy link
Member Author

Still relevant, I am removing the stale label.

@dosubot dosubot bot removed the stale Issue has not had recent activity or appears to be solved. Stale issues will be automatically closed label Dec 21, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement New feature or request triage This issue needs investigation to better define its scope and context
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@fabiobrz