Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[issue-215] - Support latest Keycloak/Red Hat Build of keycloak #216

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 10, 2025

Conversation

fabiobrz
Copy link
Member

@fabiobrz fabiobrz commented Jan 9, 2025

Description

SSIA

Resolves #215

Type of change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change
  • Chore (non-breaking change which doesn't affect codebase;
    test, version modification, documentation, etc.)

Checklist

  • Code contributed by me aligns with current project license: Apache 2.0
  • Pull Request contains a description of the changes
  • Pull Request does not include fixes for multiple issues/topics
  • Code is self-descriptive and/or documented
  • I have implemented unit tests to cover my changes
  • I tested my code in OpenShift

@fabiobrz
Copy link
Member Author

fabiobrz commented Jan 9, 2025

/test

@fabiobrz
Copy link
Member Author

fabiobrz commented Jan 9, 2025

Intersmash PR CI check results

Hi @fabiobrz, this comment is meant to report the outcome of Intersmash integration tests,
which were triggered by @fabiobrz comment, see #216 (comment).

CI checks job <continuous-testing-umb-listener-for-intersmash-pr-checks#161> FAILED:

  • Intersmash integration tests job <eap-8.x-intersmash-integration-tests-community#93> reported failures.

  • Intersmash integration tests job <eap-8.x-intersmash-integration-tests-products-jboss-eap#94> reported failures.

  • Intersmash integration tests job <eap-8.x-intersmash-integration-tests-products-jboss-eap-xp#102> reported failures.

    Please verify your changes locally or reach out to maintainers in order to investigate the issues.

@fabiobrz
Copy link
Member Author

Intersmash PR CI check results

Hi @fabiobrz, this comment is meant to report the outcome of Intersmash integration tests, which were triggered by @fabiobrz comment, see #216 (comment).

CI checks job <continuous-testing-umb-listener-for-intersmash-pr-checks#161> FAILED:

* Intersmash integration tests job <_eap-8.x-intersmash-integration-tests-community#93_> reported failures.

Test Result (2 failures / +2)

  • org.jboss.intersmash.testsuite.provision.openshift.KafkaOpenShiftOperatorProvisionerTest.basicProvisioningTest - unrelated, and tracked already by Support latest Kafka/Streams for Apache Kafka #218
  • org.jboss.intersmash.testsuite.provision.openshift.ProvisionerCleanupTestCase.testProvisioningWorkflowCleanup - outdated cluster operators in OperatorHub, the test is passing when executed on a different OpenShift 4 cluster, as in the subsequent run <eap-8.x-intersmash-integration-tests-community#97>
* Intersmash integration tests job <_eap-8.x-intersmash-integration-tests-products-jboss-eap#94_> reported failures.

Test Result (2 failures / +2)

  • org.jboss.intersmash.testsuite.provision.openshift.Eap7TemplateProvisionerTestCase.(?)
  • org.jboss.intersmash.testsuite.provision.openshift.WildflyHelmChartExistingValuesProvisionerTest.basicProvisioningTest

Both fixed in the subsequent run <eap-8.x-intersmash-integration-tests-products-jboss-eap#95>

* Intersmash integration tests job <_eap-8.x-intersmash-integration-tests-products-jboss-eap-xp#102_> reported failures.
  • org.jboss.intersmash.testsuite.provision.openshift.WildflyBootableJarTestCase.(?) - random failure, fixed in the subsequent run <eap-8.x-intersmash-integration-tests-products-jboss-eap-xp#103>
  • org.jboss.intersmash.testsuite.provision.openshift.operator.OperatorSubscriptionTestCase.(?) - intermittent unrelated failure due to cluster instability ✅
  Please verify your changes locally or reach out to maintainers in order to investigate the issues.

Based on the above findings, the changes in the PR are deemed to pass the integration tests and can now be reviewed.

@marekkopecky
Copy link
Collaborator

MR LGTM, thank you!

@marekkopecky marekkopecky merged commit f8a9975 into Intersmash:main Jan 10, 2025
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Support latest Keycloak/Red Hat Build of Keycloak
2 participants