Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update performance results #15

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 27, 2024
Merged

Update performance results #15

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 27, 2024

Conversation

Ostrzyciel
Copy link
Member

@Ostrzyciel Ostrzyciel commented Oct 27, 2024

These results fix a few issues with the previous benchmark. It was also done on a newer version of Apache Jena, which has some optimizations to its IRI caching algorithm, positively impacting performance of the compared methods.

Jelly has also seen a few major optimizations in the meantime.

I cannot explain the performance regression in Jena Protobuf serialization. The setup was the same for this experiment, so it must be regression in Jena (5.2.0 vs 5.0.0). Or maybe something that changed in GraalVM 23, but I find this unlikely – Jelly also uses Protobuf and didn't get hit by that.

These results fix a few issues with the previous benchmark. It was also done on a newer version of Apache Jena, which has some optimizations to its IRI caching algorithm, positively impacting performance of the compared methods.
@Ostrzyciel Ostrzyciel merged commit 9a43526 into main Oct 27, 2024
1 check passed
@Ostrzyciel Ostrzyciel deleted the benchmarks-2.2.1 branch October 27, 2024 12:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant