Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Migrate away from Dierckx.jl #54
Migrate away from Dierckx.jl #54
Changes from 1 commit
bdb6fc3
55dd9ca
cbc93ee
114d5b8
29f3053
7ccbb9c
3e12464
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
With the caveat that I'm not familiar with this code, it seems to me it is inefficient to re-read the data for every call to
f19_invum
.Why don't we load it as a constant (something like
const f19_data
) at the module level? I guess that would force download the datadep when you load the package but that sounds fine to me. That would also allow it's type to be known.Frankly the data file's not even that large so we could just copy-paste the raw data into the source file unless there's some licensing issue or something ...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
100% agree. I was very tempted to just inline it while writing out that TODO. Will play around with some schemes later tn