-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 48
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
More sophisticated checks in restoreoptsum. #775
Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #775 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 96.93% 96.99% +0.06%
==========================================
Files 34 34
Lines 3358 3360 +2
==========================================
+ Hits 3255 3259 +4
+ Misses 103 101 -2
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
@dmbates can you add a test with loading a 4.22 optsum? That would also serve as a potential test if we add even more fields ( |
I added tests and improved coverage slightly. |
@dmbates I made a few changes directly:
|
Did I accidentally commit a |
No, but I almost did 😂 |
@JuliaRegistrator register |
Comments on pull requests will not trigger Registrator, as it is disabled. Please try commenting on a commit or issue. |
Closes #774
Did behavior change? Did you add need features? If so, please update NEWS.md
docs/NEWS-update.jl
to update the cross-references.Should we release your changes right away? If so, bump the version: