added readOnly in formTemplate #1280
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in the Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant Payload
participant MarkupGenerator
participant FormTemplate
participant ImageTemplate
Payload->>MarkupGenerator: Provide form/image data
MarkupGenerator->>FormTemplate: Generate form template
Payload-->>FormTemplate: Check readonly property
FormTemplate-->>MarkupGenerator: Render form with read-only fields
MarkupGenerator->>ImageTemplate: Generate image template
Payload-->>ImageTemplate: Determine image type from URL
ImageTemplate-->>MarkupGenerator: Render image with detected type
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
webplugin/js/app/km-richtext-markup-1.0.js (1)
503-503: LGTM! The readOnly implementation looks good.The changes correctly implement the readOnly feature by:
- Adding the readonly attribute to the input field template
- Properly handling the readonly property from the payload
However, consider adding unit tests to verify this new functionality.
Would you like me to help create unit tests for the readOnly feature?
Also applies to: 990-992
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
webplugin/js/app/km-richtext-markup-1.0.js(4 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
webplugin/js/app/km-richtext-markup-1.0.js (1)
386-386: LGTM!The indentation fix improves code readability.
| options.payload = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(payload)); | ||
| options.payload?.forEach((payload) => { | ||
| payload.type = payload.url?.split('.').pop()?.toLowerCase(); | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Browser compatibility issue confirmed - Optional chaining not supported in IE
The codebase explicitly checks for Internet Explorer compatibility in mck-app.js and contains browser detection code. Since there's no transpilation setup and IE support is required, the use of optional chaining (?.) should be replaced with the suggested compatible approach:
options.payload && options.payload.forEach((payload) => {
payload.type = payload.url && payload.url.split('.').pop() && payload.url.split('.').pop().toLowerCase();
});🔗 Analysis chain
Consider browser compatibility for optional chaining.
While the logic for extracting file extensions is good, the use of optional chaining (?.) and nullish coalescing operators (??) might not be supported in older browsers, particularly Internet Explorer which was mentioned in the PR description.
Run this script to check browser compatibility requirements:
Consider using a more compatible approach:
- options.payload?.forEach((payload) => {
- payload.type = payload.url?.split('.').pop()?.toLowerCase();
+ options.payload && options.payload.forEach((payload) => {
+ payload.type = payload.url && payload.url.split('.').pop() && payload.url.split('.').pop().toLowerCase();🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for browser compatibility requirements in package.json or similar files
# Look for babel config or browserslist config that might indicate target browsers
# Search for package.json
echo "Checking package.json for browser targets..."
fd "package.json" --exec cat {} \; | jq -r '.browserslist // .babel // empty'
# Search for .browserslistrc
echo "Checking .browserslistrc..."
fd ".browserslistrc" --exec cat {} \;
# Search for babel.config.js
echo "Checking babel.config.js..."
fd "babel.config.js" --exec cat {} \;
Length of output: 391
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for webpack configs and other build tool configurations
echo "Checking for webpack and other build configs..."
fd -e config.js -e webpack.config.js
# Look for IE-specific comments or patterns in JS files
echo -e "\nChecking for IE-related patterns in JS files..."
rg -i "internet explorer|msie|trident" --type js
# Check for polyfills
echo -e "\nChecking for polyfills..."
rg -i "polyfill|babel|core-js" --type js
Length of output: 87157
What do you want to achieve?
PR Checklist
How was the code tested?
What new thing you came across while writing this code?
In case you fixed a bug then please describe the root cause of it?
Screenshot
NOTE: Make sure you're comparing your branch with the correct base branch
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Improvements