Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

added character limit for ES and CX bot. TDH-1685 #1281

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: development
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

thakaresakshi121
Copy link
Contributor

@thakaresakshi121 thakaresakshi121 commented Jan 9, 2025

What do you want to achieve?

  • adding different character limit from dialogflow ES and CX bot
    for ES - limit is 256
    For CX - limit is 500

PR Checklist

  • I have tested it locally and all functionalities are working fine.
  • I have compared it with mocks and all design elements are the same.
  • I have tested it in IE Browser.

How was the code tested?

What new thing you came across while writing this code?

In case you fixed a bug then please describe the root cause of it?

Screenshot

NOTE: Make sure you're comparing your branch with the correct base branch

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated default label text for character limit warning to use a more generic placeholder message.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 9, 2025

Warnings
⚠️ Please add the JIRA issue key to the PR title (e.g. FW-123)
Messages
📖 New Files in this PR: - 0

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS against 24d6e3f

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 9, 2025

Warning

There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool’s configuration or disable the tool if it’s a critical failure.

🔧 Biome (1.9.4)
webplugin/js/app/mck-sidebox-1.0.js

The --json option is unstable/experimental and its output might change between patches/minor releases.
Biome encountered an unexpected error

This is a bug in Biome, not an error in your code, and we would appreciate it if you could report it to https://github.com/biomejs/biome/issues/ along with the following information to help us fixing the issue:

Source Location: crates/biome_console/src/lib.rs:149:14
Thread Name: main
Message: called Result::unwrap() on an Err value: Os { code: 32, kind: BrokenPipe, message: "Broken pipe" }

Walkthrough

The pull request involves a modification in the default-labels.js file, specifically updating the label text for the character limit warning. The change replaces the hardcoded character limit of 256 with a placeholder term "LIMIT", indicating a potential for dynamic value assignment in the future. The overall structure and functionality of the getLabels method remain unchanged.

Changes

File Change Summary
webplugin/js/app/labels/default-labels.js Updated label text for character limit warning from hardcoded "256 characters" to generic "LIMIT characters"

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant Code as Default Labels
    participant Config as Configuration
    Code->>Config: Retrieve character limit
    Config-->>Code: Return dynamic LIMIT value
Loading

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 45c563d and 24d6e3f.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • webplugin/js/app/mck-sidebox-1.0.js (4 hunks)
🔥 Files not summarized due to errors (1)
  • webplugin/js/app/mck-sidebox-1.0.js: Error: Server error: no LLM provider could handle the message
👮 Files not reviewed due to content moderation or server errors (1)
  • webplugin/js/app/mck-sidebox-1.0.js

Finishing Touches

  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
webplugin/js/app/labels/default-labels.js (1)

10-10: Enhance code quality with documentation and tests.

To improve maintainability and clarity:

  1. Add documentation explaining the character limit requirements for different bot types
  2. Define constants for the limit values
  3. Add unit tests for the template with different bot types

Example improvements:

/**
 * Character limits for different bot types:
 * - Dialogflow ES: 256 characters
 * - Dialogflow CX: 500 characters
 * 
 * These limits are enforced to help the bot understand messages easily.
 */
const CHARACTER_LIMITS = Object.freeze({
    DIALOGFLOW_ES: 256,
    DIALOGFLOW_CX: 500
});

// Add unit tests
describe('char.limit.warn template', () => {
    it('should display correct limit for ES bot', () => {
        expect(labels['char.limit.warn'].template(CHARACTER_LIMITS.DIALOGFLOW_ES))
            .toContain('256 characters');
    });
    
    it('should display correct limit for CX bot', () => {
        expect(labels['char.limit.warn'].template(CHARACTER_LIMITS.DIALOGFLOW_CX))
            .toContain('500 characters');
    });
});
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between bea9149 and 45c563d.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • webplugin/js/app/labels/default-labels.js (1 hunks)
  • webplugin/js/app/mck-sidebox-1.0.js (3 hunks)
🔥 Files not summarized due to errors (1)
  • webplugin/js/app/mck-sidebox-1.0.js: Error: Server error: no LLM provider could handle the message
👮 Files not reviewed due to content moderation or server errors (1)
  • webplugin/js/app/mck-sidebox-1.0.js
🔇 Additional comments (1)
webplugin/js/app/labels/default-labels.js (1)

10-10: Address potential security and error handling concerns.

The current implementation has several areas that need attention:

  1. Security: Using innerHTML for setting the warning message
  2. Error handling: No validation for missing or invalid limit values
  3. Performance: Consider optimizing jQuery DOM manipulations

Let's verify the usage of innerHTML and potential XSS vulnerabilities:

Consider these improvements:

  1. Use textContent instead of innerHTML for setting the warning message
  2. Add input validation and error handling for limit values
  3. Consider using modern DOM manipulation methods instead of jQuery

@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ class KMLabel {
'search.contacts': 'Contacts',
'search.groups': 'Groups',
'char.limit.warn':
'Keep your message within 256 characters to help the bot understand easily',
'Keep your message within LIMIT characters to help the bot understand easily',
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Implementation doesn't fully address the PR objectives.

While replacing "256" with "LIMIT" makes the message template dynamic, the implementation is incomplete as it doesn't include:

  1. Logic to differentiate between ES (256) and CX (500) bots
  2. Mechanism to inject the actual character limit value

Consider implementing a configuration mechanism to:

  1. Detect the bot type (ES/CX)
  2. Set the appropriate character limit
  3. Inject the limit value into the message template

Example approach:

// In a configuration file
const BOT_LIMITS = {
    ES: 256,
    CX: 500
};

// In the labels class
'char.limit.warn': (botType) => 
    `Keep your message within ${BOT_LIMITS[botType]} characters to help the bot understand easily`

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider a more maintainable implementation approach.

The current string-based approach with a "LIMIT" placeholder is prone to errors and difficult to maintain. Consider:

  1. Using a template function instead of string interpolation
  2. Adding type safety for the limit value
  3. Including validation for the injected value

Example implementation:

'char.limit.warn': {
    template: (limit) => {
        if (typeof limit !== 'number' || limit <= 0) {
            throw new Error('Invalid character limit');
        }
        return `Keep your message within ${limit} characters to help the bot understand easily`;
    },
    defaultLimit: 256 // Fallback value
}

@@ -4610,11 +4610,11 @@ const firstVisibleMsg = {
return;
}
if (CURRENT_GROUP_DATA.CHAR_CHECK) {
var warningLength = 199;
var maxLength = 256;
var warningLength = CURRENT_GROUP_DATA.isDialogflowCXBot ? 450 : 199;
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

move these numbers to constant

@thakaresakshi121 thakaresakshi121 changed the title added character limit for ES and CX bot added character limit for ES and CX bot. TDH-1685 Jan 10, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants