feat: backendTLSPolicy controller

[mlavacca]

What this PR does / why we need it:

This PR introduces the BackendTLSPolicy controller that does the following:

• get the BackendTLSPolicy that triggered the reconciliation loop
• fetches all the gateways that are affected by such policy
• if some affected gateways are managed by KIC, update the BackendTLSPolicy object in the internal cache

Which issue this PR fixes:

Part of #6631

Special notes for your reviewer:

PR Readiness Checklist:

Complete these before marking the PR as ready to review:

• the CHANGELOG.md release notes have been updated to reflect any significant (and particularly user-facing) changes introduced by this PR

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 49.54955% with 168 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 77.7%. Comparing base (f187f31) to head (805281f).
Report is 6 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...controllers/gateway/backendtlspolicy_controller.go	39.0%	89 Missing and 17 partials ⚠️
...rnal/controllers/gateway/backendtlspolicy_utils.go	55.2%	45 Missing and 6 partials ⚠️
internal/store/fake_store.go	25.0%	5 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
internal/manager/scheme/scheme.go	0.0%	2 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
internal/store/store.go	0.0%	2 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##            main   #6712     +/-   ##
=======================================
- Coverage   77.8%   77.7%   -0.2%     
=======================================
  Files        204     206      +2     
  Lines      23870   24302    +432     
=======================================
+ Hits       18590   18889    +299     
- Misses      4337    4441    +104     
- Partials     943     972     +29     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[randmonkey]

So this PR only include the controller to load BackendPolicies into the storage?

[mlavacca]

So this PR only include the controller to load BackendPolicies into the storage?

Yes, I prefer to iterate on the problem instead of having a huge unique PR (as this is something that will likely require a big bunch of code). I improved the PR description to make clear what this PR does.

[randmonkey]

Overall LGTM, only some minor comments.