Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

specset::to_silo rewrite #1347

Merged

Conversation

JustinPrivitera
Copy link
Member

handle the case where not all materials have species, use some silo optimizations, tests for many strange cases.

// material map and the final zone is mixed and contains that material,
// then we can get an index that is out of bounds. This is ok because
// downstream tools like VisIt read based on the number of species, so
// even though the index is garbage it goes unused.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Add to comment that Silo requires a slot for this data because the buffer indexing needs be consistent with the material indices? (Is that the right way to say it?)

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

note included below

@cyrush cyrush added this to the 0.9.3 milestone Jan 11, 2025
@JustinPrivitera JustinPrivitera merged commit a9de3f4 into develop Jan 11, 2025
26 checks passed
@JustinPrivitera JustinPrivitera deleted the task/JustinPrivitera/01_09_25/to_silo_specsets_rewrite branch January 11, 2025 01:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants