-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 131
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
MRI-adaptivity #564
MRI-adaptivity #564
Conversation
…e stepper before calling rfun)
doc/arkode/guide/source/Usage/MRIStep/Custom_Inner_Stepper/Description.rst
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
doc/shared/sunadaptcontroller/SUNAdaptController_Description.rst
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
First pass at docs
doc/shared/sunadaptcontroller/SUNAdaptController_Description.rst
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Mostly minor updates and some additions to the SUNStepper interface to align with the MRIInnerStepper updates
Co-authored-by: David Gardner <[email protected]>
…p is used as an inner integrator
I believe that the only remaining item is for the missing items from the SUNStepper PR in |
… due to recent updates
… due to recent updates
Update answers for LLNL/sundials#564
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Dan's changes look good to me. All that remains are the SUNStepper items, I think those could either be addressed here or in a follow-on PR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The SUNStepper changes look good. We should address the SUNStepper / H-Tol controller compatibility in a follow-on PR.
I think that this PR is now ready for full review.
Note: I removed all of the changesets that I'd pulled from @Steven-Roberts's PR #547 to simplify the review process for this PR.