Switch to using QP for n(z) information throughout #319
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
chihway
reviewed
Oct 20, 2023
chihway
reviewed
Oct 20, 2023
chihway
reviewed
Oct 20, 2023
chihway
reviewed
Oct 20, 2023
chihway
reviewed
Oct 26, 2023
chihway
reviewed
Oct 26, 2023
chihway
reviewed
Oct 27, 2023
chihway
reviewed
Oct 27, 2023
chihway
reviewed
Oct 27, 2023
|
Ok @joezuntz I've done a pass, feel free to take or leave whatever I commented on! and happy to merge when you think it's ready |
|
Thanks for reviewing @chihway ! This is merged now. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This makes extensive changes to use QP objects for n(z) information throughout the code.
This PR includes #317 so should only be considered after that.
it also depends on QP PR 183.