Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[lua][Quest] Trouble at the Sluice to IF #7103

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 21, 2025
Merged

[lua][Quest] Trouble at the Sluice to IF #7103

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 21, 2025

Conversation

KnowOne134
Copy link
Contributor

I affirm:

  • I understand that if I do not agree to the following points by completing the checkboxes my PR will be ignored.
  • I understand I should leave resolving conversations to the LandSandBoat team so that reviewers won't miss what was said.
  • I have read and understood the Contributing Guide and the Code of Conduct.
  • I have tested my code and the things my code has changed since the last commit in the PR and will test after any later commits.

What does this pull request do?

moves quest to IF

Steps to test these changes

all same functionality retained,

@KnowOne134 KnowOne134 marked this pull request as draft February 20, 2025 20:05
@KnowOne134 KnowOne134 force-pushed the quest-trouble branch 4 times, most recently from 8dbb34f to 58be4f0 Compare February 20, 2025 23:52
@KnowOne134 KnowOne134 marked this pull request as ready for review February 20, 2025 23:53
@zach2good zach2good changed the title [lua][Quest] Trouble at the SLuice to IF [lua][Quest] Trouble at the Sluice to IF Feb 21, 2025
@zach2good zach2good merged commit dd6b76f into LandSandBoat:base Feb 21, 2025
13 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@zach2good zach2good zach2good approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@KnowOne134 @zach2good