-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 349
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore: Add market widget integration test ✅ #8777
base: develop
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ 4 Skipped Deployments
|
Wiz Scan Summary
To detect these findings earlier in the dev lifecycle, try using Wiz Code VS Code Extension. |
f7c14f5
to
12c75d2
Compare
@@ -57,6 +57,7 @@ function WidgetRow({ data, index, range, enableNewFeature }: PropsBodyElem) { | |||
py="6px" | |||
onClick={enableNewFeature ? onCurrencyClick : undefined} | |||
featureFlagEnabled={enableNewFeature} | |||
data-testid={"market-performance-widget-row-" + index} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
"market-performance-widget-row-" + index
->
`market-performance-widget-row-${index}`
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ | |||
import { MarketItemPerformer } from "@ledgerhq/live-common/market/utils/types"; | |||
import { PortfolioRange } from "@ledgerhq/types-live"; | |||
|
|||
import { CurrencyCheck, Order } from "~/renderer/screens/dashboard/MarketPerformanceWidget/types"; | |||
import { CurrencyCheck, Order } from "~/newArch/features/MarketPerformanceWidget/types"; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LLD/features/arketPerformanceWidget/types
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@ | |||
/* eslint-disable @typescript-eslint/no-unused-vars */ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
is it possible to get rid of this ? if not can you add a comment above to justify why ? thanks
12c75d2
to
8df3136
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM (unit test based PR that have no impact on the functional side)
✅ Checklist
npx changeset
was attached.📝 Description
Architecture Changes:
Enhancements:
❓ Context
🧐 Checklist for the PR Reviewers