Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: batch address mt #1365

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Dec 10, 2024
Merged

Conversation

ananas-block
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@ananas-block ananas-block changed the base branch from jorrit/feat-bloomfilter-queues to sergey/batch-address-update-rebased-fixed November 28, 2024 03:48
@ananas-block ananas-block changed the base branch from sergey/batch-address-update-rebased-fixed to jorrit/test-rebase-audit-branch November 28, 2024 03:48
@ananas-block ananas-block changed the base branch from jorrit/test-rebase-audit-branch to feat/batched-trees December 4, 2024 16:24
feat: forester clears bloom filter

feat: insert zkp batch

feat: read only address
@ananas-block ananas-block force-pushed the jorrit/feat-batch-address-mt branch from 434f4a1 to cdb92dd Compare December 5, 2024 00:59
@ananas-block ananas-block force-pushed the jorrit/feat-batch-address-mt branch from 5d8bf22 to 9ba56ac Compare December 9, 2024 00:28
@ananas-block ananas-block marked this pull request as ready for review December 10, 2024 00:16
@ananas-block ananas-block force-pushed the jorrit/feat-batch-address-mt branch from b0a0ff4 to e0d3175 Compare December 10, 2024 01:45
@ananas-block ananas-block merged commit fab4023 into feat/batched-trees Dec 10, 2024
2 of 4 checks passed
@ananas-block ananas-block deleted the jorrit/feat-batch-address-mt branch December 10, 2024 01:46
ananas-block added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 10, 2024
* fix: stop zeroing out commitments proven by inclusion

* feat: batch address tree

feat: forester clears bloom filter

feat: insert zkp batch

feat: read only address

* test: add tests and format

* add readonly account tests

* start refactor read only accounts

* feat: read only accounts

* fix: proof by index check in system program

* refactor: tx hash
sergeytimoshin pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 13, 2024
* fix: stop zeroing out commitments proven by inclusion

* feat: batch address tree

feat: forester clears bloom filter

feat: insert zkp batch

feat: read only address

* test: add tests and format

* add readonly account tests

* start refactor read only accounts

* feat: read only accounts

* fix: proof by index check in system program

* refactor: tx hash
ananas-block added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 16, 2024
* fix: stop zeroing out commitments proven by inclusion

* feat: batch address tree

feat: forester clears bloom filter

feat: insert zkp batch

feat: read only address

* test: add tests and format

* add readonly account tests

* start refactor read only accounts

* feat: read only accounts

* fix: proof by index check in system program

* refactor: tx hash
ananas-block added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 17, 2024
* fix: stop zeroing out commitments proven by inclusion

* feat: batch address tree

feat: forester clears bloom filter

feat: insert zkp batch

feat: read only address

* test: add tests and format

* add readonly account tests

* start refactor read only accounts

* feat: read only accounts

* fix: proof by index check in system program

* refactor: tx hash
sergeytimoshin added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 19, 2024
* fix: add light prover client batch update and append tests

added bloomfilter

batch e2e test failing because filter change doesn't work yet

debugging

batched Merkle tree e2e test works with output queue

fix: e2e test work with input and output queues

chore: rename wipe bloomfilter -> wipe_batch

refactored input queue into mt account

stash

test: rnd account init works

chore: replace is_inserted with state

chore: moved offset to bounded vec, added bounded vec init and deserialize

fixed bounded vec imports

refactor: partial batch zkp updates, flexible sized root history array with seq

implemented batch prove and verification in rust tests untested

stash: batched updates work with simulate transactions test

add comment

stash before account *mut

onchain account init works

test: account compression program batch updates work

feat: add flexbile nullifier to circuit

feat: implement nullifier derivation from tx hash

test: batch

test: bounded vec

cleanup

cleanup

cleanup

feat: add flexible nullifier to update circuit

fix: e2e test

chore: add full asserts to simulate tx test

test: root overwrite test

cleanup

* refactor: update health check timeout in spawn_prover function, rewrite prove_batch_append test

Change CI runner to buildjet-8vcpu-ubuntu-2204 for rust tests

run rust.yml on buildjet-16vcpu-ubuntu-2204

debug rust.yml workflow

Add step to download proving keys for big batches

Remove redundant setup steps and update test configurations

Update ProverConfig to use test-specific circuits

cleaning up after rebase to main

* fix: batch append public input computation (#1330)

Issue:
the batch append zkp public input LeavesHashchainHash is computed
dynamically from the values array during the batched update.
If the values array changes in between proof generation and transaction
execution the batched append update fails.
-> Users can make batched append update transactions fail.

Solution:
compute LeavesHashchainHash incrementally when the output value is
inserted into the value array (the same way we compute it with
nullifiers for input queue insertions).

Changes:
1. switch to updated circuits
2. batch.rs
- add start_index field to derive the leaf_index of values from a value
array
- introduce store_and_hash_value to store an output queue value and add
it to the LeavesHashchainHash
3. batched_queue.rs
- init_queue initialize start_index during account initialization
- use store_and_hash_value instead of store_value when inserting into
output queues
- update batch.start_index when wiping a batch
4. batched_merkle_tree.rs
- remove subtree field (it is not used in new batch append circuit)
- initialize root_history with the zero_value_root
- add hashchain store for leaves_hashchain in
ZeroCopyBatchedMerkleTreeAccount
- add leaf_index to nullifier hash H(value, leaf_index, tx_hash)

Co-authored-by: ananas-block <[email protected]>

* feat: integrate batched state merkle trees into programs (#1335)

* fix: rebase

* feat: rollover state trees (#1371)

* feat: rollover batch state trees

* test: batch state tree rollover

* feat: batch address mt (#1365)

* fix: stop zeroing out commitments proven by inclusion

* feat: batch address tree

feat: forester clears bloom filter

feat: insert zkp batch

feat: read only address

* test: add tests and format

* add readonly account tests

* start refactor read only accounts

* feat: read only accounts

* fix: proof by index check in system program

* refactor: tx hash

* perf: unify circuit public inputs

Issue:
- public inputs consume too many CU onchain

Impacted Circuits:
- inclusion
- non-inclusion
- combined

Changes:
- make existing public inputs private
- hash public inputs into one hash chain
- make hash chain the only public input

* chore: refactor batched trees and merkle tree metadata into separate crates

* feat: add proving keys for mt 32 (#1406)

* feat: add support for circuits with height 32 and update related tests

* chore: remove combined_32_0_0 verifying key file

* refactor: remove deprecated verifying keys, restore inclusin_26_*.rs vkeys

* refactor: prover: integration tests for mt 32

* refactor: generate_keys.sh

* fix: bounded vec mut deserialization from immutable reference

* feat: add migrate state instruction

* fix: tests

* fix: lint

* fix: system cpi tests

* fix: tests

* cleanup

---------

Co-authored-by: Sergey Timoshin <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: ananas-block <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant