Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[WIP] 207 add the work of neidhart et al as a black box #214

Merged
merged 47 commits into from
Jul 25, 2024

Conversation

RMichae1
Copy link
Collaborator

@RMichae1 RMichae1 commented Jul 10, 2024

Add work by Aita et al.
with additions of neidhart et al -> randomness from gen. Pareto instead of Gaussian , and "tunable" c.

Core method implemented as static method to an isolated black-box.

[WIP]

  • add tests logic
  • add tests batched function evaluations

@RMichae1 RMichae1 linked an issue Jul 10, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
@RMichae1
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Looks like the added tests are doing their job +1

@RMichae1 RMichae1 requested a review from miguelgondu July 12, 2024 13:17
@RMichae1
Copy link
Collaborator Author

RMichae1 commented Jul 12, 2024

Corrected black-box functionality and added tests for seeding and expected computed values.
Ready for review @miguelgondu .

Might have to rebase on current dev .

@RMichae1 RMichae1 force-pushed the 207-add-the-work-of-neidhart-et-al-as-a-black-box branch from bf19be2 to ae59dfe Compare July 12, 2024 13:45
@RMichae1 RMichae1 marked this pull request as ready for review July 12, 2024 13:47
@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ commands=
pytest {tty:--color=yes} -v -m "not slow and poli__dockstring" {posargs}

[testenv:poli-rasp-py39]
description = run the tests with pytest on the dockstring environment for poli
description = run the tests with pytest on the RaSP environment for poli
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice catch, thanks!

Copy link
Collaborator

@miguelgondu miguelgondu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey Richard! Great job, I left a couple of comments to address.

src/poli/objective_repository/rmf_landscape/register.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/poli/objective_repository/rmf_landscape/register.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/poli/objective_repository/rmf_landscape/register.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/poli/tests/registry/proteins/test_rmf.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/poli/tests/registry/proteins/test_rmf.py Show resolved Hide resolved
src/poli/tests/registry/proteins/test_rmf.py Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Collaborator

@miguelgondu miguelgondu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great! Thanks for addressing the TO-DOs.

@RMichae1
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Thanks for the review!:)

@RMichae1 RMichae1 merged commit 664a69b into dev Jul 25, 2024
6 checks passed
@RMichae1 RMichae1 deleted the 207-add-the-work-of-neidhart-et-al-as-a-black-box branch July 25, 2024 12:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add the work of Neidhart et al. as a black-box
2 participants