Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Runs for ERF #368

Closed
cmcclus opened this issue Aug 16, 2023 · 11 comments
Closed

Runs for ERF #368

cmcclus opened this issue Aug 16, 2023 · 11 comments
Labels
Run request Label for CAM developpers who requested a new development simulation

Comments

@cmcclus
Copy link

cmcclus commented Aug 16, 2023

Description of the run

Two AMIP-like (F2000climo) 10 year runs are needed to assess the effective radiative forcing from aerosol–cloud interactions (ERF_aci). Differencing the TOA radiative fluxes between a simulation with historical aerosol emissions and preindustrial aerosol emissions gives an estimate of the ERF_aci (e.g., Bellouin et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019RG000660, Smith et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-9591-2020).

Two AMIP-like (F2000climo) 10 year runs are needed using the latest development baseline:

  1. AMIP-like with historical aerosol emissions
  2. AMIP-like with with preindustrial emissions

Suffix in the casename

No response

Namelist modifications

Namelist

Source modifications

SourceMods

Sandbox

Requested sandbox or tag

Contact info

Christina McCluskey & Brian Medeiros

Any other relevant information

Enter relevant info

@cmcclus cmcclus added the Run request Label for CAM developpers who requested a new development simulation label Aug 16, 2023
@adamrher
Copy link
Collaborator

Excellent idea @cmcclus. I just sent Ben a script from Trude that sets up these aerosol sensitivity experiments. Do you want me to forward that along or do you already know how to do this?

@cecilehannay
Copy link
Collaborator

cecilehannay commented Aug 17, 2023 via email

@cecilehannay
Copy link
Collaborator

cecilehannay commented Aug 17, 2023 via email

@cmcclus
Copy link
Author

cmcclus commented Aug 17, 2023

@adamrher - yes, please include me with aerosol-related questions/tests. When you say "aerosol sensitivity experiments", do you mean the two different climate simulations (pre-industrial vs. present day)?

@cecilehannay - I wonder if we could include this as a regularly scheduled simulation set to run each time you have a new baseline. I'd like to keep an eye on ERF on a regular basis, if possible!

@cecilehannay
Copy link
Collaborator

We certainly can include this as a regular simulation.
During CAM5 and CAM6 development,I was doing regular simulation pre-industrial/present day aerosol for Andrew. It is a good suggestion to restart doing this

@swrneale
Copy link
Collaborator

@cmcclus this is great for you to take up this analysis since this is your area of expertise :) and we really need to keep an eye on this as @cecilehannay said

@adamrher
Copy link
Collaborator

In case it's helpful, here's the email I rec'd from Trude:

Hi Adam

I have the scripts here:

/glade/campaign/cgd/projects/ppe/cam_ppe/rerun_PPE_250

If you look at the difference between build_ppe_CAM_cases_PD.py and build_ppe_CAM_cases_PI.py, you will see how to specify the 1850 aerosols.

@adamrher
Copy link
Collaborator

adamrher commented Aug 17, 2023

In addition to running the ERF test with the current code base, can we also run it for CESM2.1 CAM6 (official CESM2), so we have a benchmark?

@cmcclus
Copy link
Author

cmcclus commented Aug 17, 2023

I agree, @adamrher and just mentioned this to Cecile before seeing your note. If there is a big difference, I will likely want the same simulation set for some other tags, but let's see where it is now.

I'll be attending the CAM7 meetings coming on up to be more in tune with model changes to request the ERF simulations set when there is reason to worry about changes to the aerosol-cloud-interactions.

@cecilehannay
Copy link
Collaborator

There is no FLT compset for 2000 or 2000climo. I am setting the run to run 2000 but it will be mix of 2000 and 2000climo datasets.

@cecilehannay
Copy link
Collaborator

See #388 and #389

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Run request Label for CAM developpers who requested a new development simulation
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants