You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
(1) The GRIB2 fields of "ABSV" (absolute vorticity) on isobaric surfaces are problematic when using UPP on HFIP–MPAS output. For these ABSV fields:
A 1-DX "ring" of noisy values is present, and
values are entirely zero within this ring.
The presence of missing values surrounding the computational domain is the underlying reason for this problem. To fix the issue, the calculations for obtaining wind at mass points ("UH" and "VH") should first check for "SPVAL".
(2) Additionally, the surface latent-heat flux currently reads-in from a netCDF array called "QFX". However, for current MPAS applications in RRFS and HFIP, this array is actually named "LH."
jaymes-kenyon
changed the title
Problem with absolute vorticity fields in HFIP–MPAS applications
MPAS applications: issues with absolute vorticity and latent-heat flux fields
Oct 17, 2024
(1) The GRIB2 fields of "ABSV" (absolute vorticity) on isobaric surfaces are problematic when using UPP on HFIP–MPAS output. For these ABSV fields:
The presence of missing values surrounding the computational domain is the underlying reason for this problem. To fix the issue, the calculations for obtaining wind at mass points ("UH" and "VH") should first check for "SPVAL".
(2) Additionally, the surface latent-heat flux currently reads-in from a netCDF array called "QFX". However, for current MPAS applications in RRFS and HFIP, this array is actually named "LH."
This issue can be assigned to @jaymes-kenyon
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: