Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

use git large file for large zip files #214

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 1, 2024

Conversation

CunliangGeng
Copy link
Member

@CunliangGeng CunliangGeng commented Mar 1, 2024

Use git large file storage (lfs) for large zip files.

Added a new file "local_mode_example.zip" which is about 200MB. This large file prevent pushing code to github, so it's better to use git lfs to mange large files.

@gcroci2
Copy link
Contributor

gcroci2 commented Mar 1, 2024

Use git large file storage (lfs) for large zip files.

Added a new file "local_mode_example.zip" which is about 200MB. This large file prevent pushing code to github, so it's better to use git lfs to mange large files.

How does the file prevent pushing code?

@CunliangGeng
Copy link
Member Author

I saw the following warning when committing the large file:

image

Copy link
Member Author

CunliangGeng commented Mar 1, 2024

Merge activity

  • Mar 1, 9:49 AM EST: @CunliangGeng started a stack merge that includes this pull request via Graphite.
  • Mar 1, 9:58 AM EST: Graphite rebased this pull request as part of a merge.
  • Mar 1, 9:59 AM EST: @CunliangGeng merged this pull request with Graphite.

Base automatically changed from update_strain_mappings_generator to dev March 1, 2024 14:57
Added a new file "local_mode_example.zip" which is about 200MB.
@CunliangGeng CunliangGeng merged commit 1eed2aa into dev Mar 1, 2024
1 of 2 checks passed
@CunliangGeng CunliangGeng deleted the use_git_large_file_storage branch March 1, 2024 14:59
This was referenced Mar 5, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants