Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update README: reference, history, Cobrawap Community #74

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Jul 18, 2024

Conversation

gulpgiulia
Copy link
Collaborator

Details:
(i) reference updated (from arxive to final doi); (ii) project history updated (from HBP-Wavescales to present status in EBRAINS); (iii) Cobrawap Community updated (from "Wavescales involved partners" to illustration of Core-Team, Support-Team and Scientific Partners, and list of involved people in alphabethical order).

++other minor changes (punctuations, slight reformulations, etc...)

… doi), (ii) the history of the project (from HBP-Wavescales to present in EBRAINS), (iii) the Cobrawap Community (from Wavescales involved partners to Core-Team, Support-Team and Scientific Partners)
@gulpgiulia gulpgiulia requested a review from mdenker June 22, 2024 10:29
@gulpgiulia gulpgiulia added this to the v0.2.0 milestone Jun 22, 2024
@gulpgiulia
Copy link
Collaborator Author

gulpgiulia commented Jun 22, 2024

see also PR #59 (that is on Update README as well)

@gulpgiulia gulpgiulia requested a review from cosimolupo June 24, 2024 09:54
README.rst Outdated
=================
Cobrawap was originally developed in the context the `Human Brain Project <https://www.humanbrainproject.eu>`_ and is part of the `EBRAINS <https://www.ebrains.eu>`_ infrastructure. Partners involved in the collaboration and use case within the project (*WaveScalES*) are:
Cobrawap is currently provided as a `tool <https://www.ebrains.eu/tools/cobrawap>`_ of the `EBRAINS <https://www.ebrains.eu>`_ infrastructure and included in the `EBRAINS-Italy <https://www.ebrains-italy.eu/>`_ initiative. Further details on fundings and resources are in the `Acknowledgments <https://github.com/NeuralEnsemble/cobrawap/blob/master/doc/source/acknowledgments.rst>`_ file in the doc session.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

At the very end of the statement, there is a typo: "session" -> "section", or even better "folder".

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done. new commit added.

@gulpgiulia gulpgiulia requested a review from cosimolupo June 25, 2024 13:52
README.rst Outdated
Comment on lines 34 to 36
For researchers to be able to effectively reproduce results and build on each other's progress, it is important to not only make results openly accessible and to facilitate data sharing, but also to build the analysis workflows in a shareable and reusable manner.

Making analysis scripts available alongside results and datasets is good. What is even better is to design the analysis workflows for specific research questions in such a manner that they are general and flexible enough to be actively reused in further research. In this way, the rigor of the analysis workflow is increased, and the design of the analysis process is simplified for the researcher
Making analysis scripts available alongside results and datasets is good. What is even better is to design the analysis workflows for specific research questions in such a manner that they are general and flexible enough to be actively reused in further research. In this way, the rigor of the analysis workflow is increased, and the design of the analysis process is simplified for the researcher.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would suggest to remove these two paragraphs. I think these paragraphs had a use before where we did not have Cobrawap out in the open. Today, however, I suppose that someone reading this text will probably just want to know what Cobrawap is, but has little interest on our high-level opinion on how to do research. I would argue shorter is better in this case.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fine with me, I agree with your point, we can remove both paragraphs; check if @rgutzen is fine as well, I didn't want to overturn his formulation and communication objective

README.rst Show resolved Hide resolved
README.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
gulpgiulia and others added 3 commits July 3, 2024 14:16
add paragraph to short list related projects (as SWAVE)

Co-authored-by: Michael Denker <[email protected]>
New title for the paragraph requires a longer underline

Co-authored-by: Michael Denker <[email protected]>
…owledgments: EBRAINS-InfraServ added in the list of fundings
README.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@mdenker mdenker merged commit 391ad59 into NeuralEnsemble:master Jul 18, 2024
@cosimolupo cosimolupo deleted the docs/update_readme_v0.2.0 branch August 14, 2024 15:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants