Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

46 prep statement fixes #56

Closed
wants to merge 13 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

vitalylativ
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@@ -35,11 +35,13 @@ def push(auth, key, file, cost, verbose=False):
return res.json()


def get(auth, key=None, bid_status=None, verbose=False):
def get(auth, key=None, bid_status=None, verbose=False, statement_key=None):
headers = get_headers(auth)
url = URL + f"_db/{DB_NAME}/{MOUNT}/bid/"
if bid_status:
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it will be better to have an opportunity to combine bid_status and statement tag.

NickVolynkin and others added 9 commits May 30, 2023 13:43
Required for building proof-market-toolchain in CI.
* updated dependencies

* submodule links updated

* switched branches for hash and blueprint

* fixed parser for new mina state json

* removing extra spaces

* zkllvm update #28

* formatting

* proof-producer updated

* update dependencies

* remove debugging info #28

---------

Co-authored-by: arakelov <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: hgedia <[email protected]>
…k-to-requestproposal

49 change terminology bidask to requestproposal
@NickVolynkin
Copy link
Contributor

After merging #36 the CI checks how proof-market-toolchain builds. Please rebase this PR to enable this check in it.

@SK0M0R0H SK0M0R0H closed this Jul 27, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants