-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 22
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
adding xue2024b #52
adding xue2024b #52
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for this! Would you mind formatting the record consistent with the other USENIX Security records?
@@ -288,6 +297,15 @@ @inproceedings{Wails2024a | |||
discussion_url = {https://github.com/net4people/bbs/issues/312}, | |||
} | |||
|
|||
@inproceedings{Ding2023a, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm undecided about adding this. Steganography work is certainly adjacent to censorship but I see it as its own, fairly substantial, body of research and I'd like to avoid adding more and more steganography work over time. What do you think? Is there merit in adding this particular paper?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi, good point. I've only added it because the paper explicitly mentions that it can provide provably secure steganography for Internet censorship circumvention. There are already steganography papers in the censorbib (Stegozoa, Meteor, etc.) that are similar, but Discop seems to be a particularly detection-resistant approach.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok, fair. Let's get this merged then. Thanks again for your help!
No description provided.