Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

assign population if existing and added a test #428

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 29, 2024
Merged

Conversation

egillax
Copy link
Collaborator

@egillax egillax commented Jan 29, 2024

Fixed my own mistake - didn't assign the population object correctly in the last PR. Added a unit tests that tests when we use an existing population in our code.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 29, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (f212580) 89.32% compared to head (118cc7c) 89.37%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop     #428      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    89.32%   89.37%   +0.04%     
===========================================
  Files           49       49              
  Lines         9830     9831       +1     
===========================================
+ Hits          8781     8786       +5     
+ Misses        1049     1045       -4     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@egillax egillax merged commit 6233377 into develop Jan 29, 2024
12 checks passed
@egillax egillax deleted the assign_population branch February 23, 2024 14:01
egillax added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 5, 2024
* Update DESCRIPTION

* only resrtict to first if many observations per subjectId

* fix assignment operator in configurePython (#421)

* Tibble dependancy removal (#422)

* remove unnecessary remotes (#423)

* Study population improvements (#424)

* assign population if existing and added a test (#428)

* 429 save cdm database name (#430)

* save dev database name and schema in trainDetails (#434)

* preserve attributes when splitting data

* Prevent plpData from being evaluated during do.call (#436)

* test improvements (#438)

* fix duplicate vignette titles

---------

Co-authored-by: jreps <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Henrik <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant