Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update tslint-eslint-rules to version 4.1.1 🚀 #1006

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

greenkeeperio-bot
Copy link
Contributor

🚨🔥⚠️ Action required: Switch to the new Greenkeeper now! 🚨🔥⚠️
This version of Greenkeper will be shutdown on May 31st.
With Integrations first-class bot support landed on GitHub and we’ve rewritten Greenkeeper to take full advantage of it. Simpler setup, fewer pull-requests, faster than ever.


Hello lovely humans,

tslint-eslint-rules just published its new version 4.1.1.

State Update 🚀
Dependency tslint-eslint-rules
New version 4.1.1
Type devDependency

This version is not covered by your current version range.

Without accepting this pull request your project will work just like it did before. There might be a bunch of new features, fixes and perf improvements that the maintainers worked on for you though.

I recommend you look into these changes and try to get onto the latest version of tslint-eslint-rules.
Given that you have a decent test suite, a passing build is a strong indicator that you can take advantage of these changes by merging the proposed change into your project. Otherwise this branch is a great starting point for you to work on the update.

Do you have any ideas how I could improve these pull requests? Did I report anything you think isn’t right?
Are you unsure about how things are supposed to work?

There is a collection of frequently asked questions and while I’m just a bot, there is a group of people who are happy to teach me new things. Let them know.

Good luck with your project ✨

You rock!

🌴


GitHub Release

See CHANGELOG.


The new version differs by 170 commits .

  • 0f8c708 [docs] v4.1.1
  • 5fdf4ae Merge pull request #228 from RecuencoJones/ter-valid-jsdoc
  • ea27dae [code-review] Use hasModifier helper.
  • 3bd2daf [bug] fixed valid-jsdoc rule (closes #227)
  • 25656e4 [docs] v4.1.0
  • 9135a0a Merge pull request #225 from buzinas/benchmark
  • f7d6aa3 Merge pull request #226 from buzinas/new-rules-docs
  • 6eb0608 [docs] update CONTRIBUTING page to state that rules must have ter prefix
  • aad88fb [style] changed benchMark to BenchMark
  • 962ab5c [comment] added comment explaining why we need parameter
  • 2c549e2 [typo] meant all lowercase
  • adc48ee Merge branch 'master' into benchmark
  • fdf0230 Merge pull request #223 from jogit82/changeRulesType
  • 5beea54 Merge pull request #218 from buzinas/updates
  • 9335b5a [revert] I used an all optional object so no need to explicitly declare them

There are 170 commits in total. See the full diff.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants