Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix : Workflows are not terminated if errors are detected #163

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

asterisk-ragavan
Copy link
Contributor

@asterisk-ragavan asterisk-ragavan commented Mar 7, 2025

  • Added error raising on line 108 to halt workflow execution when an error occurs.

  • Implemented level 2 logging for the initial error.

  • Captured and logged the first line of the error at level 0 for user visibility.

  • Ensures workflow termination and proper error reporting.

  • This will resolve issue Workflows are not terminated if errors are detected #154

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Improved error handling by ensuring that failures during command execution are now explicitly reported, preventing silent failures.
    • Refined error logging to show concise, first-line error messages for clearer and more effective troubleshooting.

Added error raising on line 108 to halt workflow execution when an error occurs.
Implemented level 2 logging for the initial error.
Captured and logged the first line of the error at level 0 for user visibility.
Ensures workflow termination and proper error reporting.
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 7, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request updates error handling in two workflow components. In the CommandExecutor, the run_command method now raises a RuntimeError when a shell command fails (detecting stderr output or a non-zero return code) instead of just logging the error. In the WorkflowManager, the error logging within the workflow process has been modified to output only the first line of an exception message, resulting in more concise error reporting.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/.../CommandExecutor.py Updated run_command to raise a RuntimeError with a detailed error message instead of solely logging errors when a command fails.
src/.../WorkflowManager.py Modified workflow_process to log only the first line of any exception, streamlining error reporting by trimming redundant information.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Caller
    participant CommandExecutor
    participant Shell
    Caller->>CommandExecutor: run_command(command)
    CommandExecutor->>Shell: Execute command
    Shell-->>CommandExecutor: (stdout, stderr, returnCode)
    alt Error detected (stderr exists or non-zero return code)
        CommandExecutor->>Caller: raise RuntimeError("Process failed: ...")
    else No error
        CommandExecutor->>Caller: Return command output
    end
Loading
sequenceDiagram
    participant Caller
    participant WorkflowManager
    participant Logger
    Caller->>WorkflowManager: workflow_process()
    WorkflowManager->>WorkflowManager: Process workflow
    alt Exception occurs
        WorkflowManager->>Logger: log(first line of error message)
    else No exception
        WorkflowManager->>Caller: Continue processing
    end
Loading

Poem

I'm a rabbit on a hop so bright,
With errors caught, I leap with delight.
Exceptions now ring like a crisp bell,
Logging trimmed to keep things well.
Code carrots crunch in the digital night—
Hopping through changes, everything's just right!


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 75fa783 and d1b92be.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/workflow/CommandExecutor.py (1 hunks)
  • src/workflow/WorkflowManager.py (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
  • GitHub Check: build-openms
  • GitHub Check: build-simple-app
  • GitHub Check: build-full-app
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/workflow/WorkflowManager.py (1)

53-53: Improvement to error message readability

This change enhances user experience by displaying only the first line of error messages, which often contains the most relevant information. Long stack traces can be overwhelming to users, so showing just the essential error information is a good practice.

For debugging purposes, consider adding a more detailed log at level 2 (similar to what CommandExecutor does), so developers can access the full error information when needed.

src/workflow/CommandExecutor.py (1)

108-108:

✅ Verification successful

Good fix for proper error propagation

This is a critical fix that ensures workflow execution stops when errors are detected in command execution. Previously, errors were only logged but not raised, which could lead to workflows continuing to run with incorrect or incomplete data.

The raised exception will propagate to the workflow_process method in WorkflowManager, where it's caught and logged, effectively terminating the workflow as intended.


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify that the error propagation chain works correctly
# Looking for calls to run_command to ensure they're handling the potential exception

# Find direct calls to run_command within the codebase
echo "Checking direct calls to run_command method:"
rg "run_command\(" --type py -A 2 -B 2

Length of output: 1936


Verified: Error propagation is correctly implemented

The raised exception in src/workflow/CommandExecutor.py is now effectively halting workflow execution when errors occur. The verification output confirms that calls to run_command—including those from the main workflow and other helper methods—are consistent with the intended error propagation. No further modifications are needed on this front.

  • Error propagation via raise RuntimeError(...) is in place.
  • All invocations of run_command properly align with the updated error-handling strategy.
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant