Add LICENSE file with Apache 2.0 license #432
Open
+21
−0
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Unfortunately, I can't add labels to this PR, probably it should be Documentation, as for tests, I don't think those are relevant this scope |
|
@uncleDecart thanks for the PR, we prefer MIT, is it possible you can change it to that? |
- Added a LICENSE file using the MIT license. - The license is consistent with the licensing used in the other projects within the same organization. - Ensures clarity and alignment on licensing terms across related projects. This change promotes uniformity and legal transparency for contributors and users. Signed-off-by: Pavel Abramov <[email protected]>
uncleDecart
force-pushed
the
add-license
branch
from
8effa45
to
cf8d872
Compare
|
Okay @madhavajay , fixed the LICENSE to be MIT, copied it from here |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This change promotes uniformity and legal transparency for contributors and users.
One thing I'm not sure if there're files which are licensed differently, like cpython tests
Checklist