jwt implementation api changes #20
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces a comprehensive JWT (JSON Web Token) authentication and user management system for the application. The changes include adding JWT-related dependencies, configuring Redis for user caching, implementing utility classes for token generation and validation, and creating a filter for JWT token processing. The modifications span across multiple files, introducing new classes for user data, authentication utilities, and configuration components to enhance the application's security and user management capabilities. Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant JwtUserIdValidationFilter
participant CookieUtil
participant JwtAuthenticationUtil
participant JwtUtil
participant RedisTemplate
Client->>JwtUserIdValidationFilter: Send HTTP Request
JwtUserIdValidationFilter->>CookieUtil: Get JWT Token
CookieUtil-->>JwtUserIdValidationFilter: Return Token
JwtUserIdValidationFilter->>JwtAuthenticationUtil: Validate Token
JwtAuthenticationUtil->>JwtUtil: Validate JWT Token
JwtUtil-->>JwtAuthenticationUtil: Token Claims
JwtAuthenticationUtil->>RedisTemplate: Check User in Cache
RedisTemplate-->>JwtAuthenticationUtil: User Data
JwtAuthenticationUtil-->>JwtUserIdValidationFilter: Validation Result
JwtUserIdValidationFilter->>Client: Allow/Deny Request
Poem
Tip CodeRabbit's docstrings feature is now available as part of our Early Access Program! Simply use the command Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 13
🧹 Nitpick comments (8)
src/main/java/com/iemr/common/bengen/utils/JwtAuthenticationUtil.java (1)
21-33: Use consistent dependency injectionCurrently,
cookieUtilandjwtUtilare injected both via field injection (@Autowiredon fields) and a constructor.Choose one injection method for consistency. Prefer constructor injection for mandatory dependencies.
Apply this diff to modify to constructor injection:
- @Autowired - private CookieUtil cookieUtil; - @Autowired - private JwtUtil jwtUtil; + private final CookieUtil cookieUtil; + private final JwtUtil jwtUtil; private final Logger logger = LoggerFactory.getLogger(this.getClass().getName()); - @Autowired private GenerateBeneficiaryService generateBeneficiaryService; - public JwtAuthenticationUtil(CookieUtil cookieUtil, JwtUtil jwtUtil) { + @Autowired + public JwtAuthenticationUtil(CookieUtil cookieUtil, JwtUtil jwtUtil, GenerateBeneficiaryService generateBeneficiaryService) { this.cookieUtil = cookieUtil; this.jwtUtil = jwtUtil; + this.generateBeneficiaryService = generateBeneficiaryService; }src/main/java/com/iemr/common/bengen/utils/JwtUserIdValidationFilter.java (2)
76-85: Avoid using rawsendErrormethods and consider proper exception handlingDirectly sending error responses from the filter can make error handling inconsistent.
Consider throwing exceptions and configuring an exception handler to manage error responses uniformly.
91-101: Optimize retrieval of JWT token from cookiesThe method
getJwtTokenFromCookiescan be optimized using streams for better readability.Consider refactoring as:
private String getJwtTokenFromCookies(HttpServletRequest request) { if (request.getCookies() != null) { return Arrays.stream(request.getCookies()) .filter(cookie -> "Jwttoken".equals(cookie.getName())) .map(Cookie::getValue) .findFirst() .orElse(null); } return null; }src/main/java/com/iemr/common/bengen/repo/UserRepository.java (1)
9-9: Verify the necessity of custom methodfindByUserIDThe
CrudRepositoryalready provides afindByIdmethod.If
userIDis the primary key, consider usingfindByIdinstead of creatingfindByUserID.src/main/java/com/iemr/common/bengen/utils/CookieUtil.java (1)
15-25: Consider adding cookie validationThe
getCookieValuemethod should validate cookie attributes for security-sensitive cookies.Add validation:
public Optional<String> getCookieValue(HttpServletRequest request, String cookieName) { Cookie[] cookies = request.getCookies(); if (cookies != null) { for (Cookie cookie : cookies) { - if (cookieName.equals(cookie.getName())) { + if (cookieName.equals(cookie.getName()) && validateCookie(cookie)) { return Optional.of(cookie.getValue()); } } } return Optional.empty(); } +private boolean validateCookie(Cookie cookie) { + // For security-sensitive cookies like JWT + if (jwtCookieName.equals(cookie.getName())) { + return cookie.getSecure() && cookie.isHttpOnly(); + } + return true; +}src/main/java/com/iemr/common/bengen/utils/JwtUtil.java (1)
18-21: Consider making token expiration configurableThe token expiration time is hardcoded to 24 hours. Consider making it configurable through application properties for different environments and use cases.
- private static final long EXPIRATION_TIME = 24L * 60 * 60 * 1000; // 1 day in milliseconds + @Value("${jwt.expiration}") + private long EXPIRATION_TIME;src/main/java/com/iemr/common/bengen/service/GenerateBeneficiaryService.java (1)
196-212: Enhance error handling and add request tracingThe getUserById method has basic error handling but could benefit from:
- More specific exception types
- Request tracing for better debugging
- Validation for negative or zero userId
+@Slf4j public class GenerateBeneficiaryService { + public User getUserById(Long userId) throws UserNotFoundException { + String requestId = UUID.randomUUID().toString(); + log.debug("Request {} - Fetching user with ID: {}", requestId, userId); + + if (userId == null || userId <= 0) { + throw new IllegalArgumentException("User ID must be a positive number"); + } + try { User user = userRepository.findByUserID(userId); if (user == null) { - throw new Exception("User not found with ID: " + userId); + throw new UserNotFoundException("User not found with ID: " + userId); } + log.debug("Request {} - Successfully retrieved user: {}", requestId, userId); return user; } catch (Exception e) { - logger.error("Error fetching user with ID: " + userId, e); - throw new Exception("Error fetching user with ID: " + userId, e); + log.error("Request {} - Error fetching user with ID: {}", requestId, userId, e); + throw new UserServiceException("Error fetching user", e); } }pom.xml (1)
342-361: Consider using property for JWT dependency versionsThe JWT dependencies share the same version number. Consider using a property to manage the version centrally.
<properties> + <jjwt.version>0.12.6</jjwt.version> </properties> <dependency> <groupId>io.jsonwebtoken</groupId> <artifactId>jjwt-api</artifactId> - <version>0.12.6</version> + <version>${jjwt.version}</version> </dependency> <dependency> <groupId>io.jsonwebtoken</groupId> <artifactId>jjwt-impl</artifactId> - <version>0.12.6</version> + <version>${jjwt.version}</version> <scope>runtime</scope> </dependency> <dependency> <groupId>io.jsonwebtoken</groupId> <artifactId>jjwt-jackson</artifactId> - <version>0.12.6</version> + <version>${jjwt.version}</version> <scope>runtime</scope> </dependency>
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (14)
pom.xml(4 hunks)src/main/environment/bengen_ci.properties(1 hunks)src/main/environment/bengen_dev.properties(1 hunks)src/main/environment/bengen_example.properties(1 hunks)src/main/environment/bengen_uat.properties(1 hunks)src/main/java/com/iemr/common/bengen/data/user/User.java(1 hunks)src/main/java/com/iemr/common/bengen/repo/UserRepository.java(1 hunks)src/main/java/com/iemr/common/bengen/service/GenerateBeneficiaryService.java(2 hunks)src/main/java/com/iemr/common/bengen/utils/CookieUtil.java(1 hunks)src/main/java/com/iemr/common/bengen/utils/FilterConfig.java(1 hunks)src/main/java/com/iemr/common/bengen/utils/JwtAuthenticationUtil.java(1 hunks)src/main/java/com/iemr/common/bengen/utils/JwtUserIdValidationFilter.java(1 hunks)src/main/java/com/iemr/common/bengen/utils/JwtUtil.java(1 hunks)src/test/java/com/iemr/common/bengen/GenerateBeneficiaryServiceTests.java(2 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (4)
- src/main/environment/bengen_example.properties
- src/main/environment/bengen_dev.properties
- src/test/java/com/iemr/common/bengen/GenerateBeneficiaryServiceTests.java
- src/main/environment/bengen_uat.properties
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/main/java/com/iemr/common/bengen/data/user/User.java (1)
22-23: Clarify the usage of insertable = false on the deleted field
Setting insertable = false means that the deleted field won't be included in SQL INSERT statements.
Ensure that this behavior is intentional.
Run the following script to check for annotations on the deleted field:
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more context about the deleted field usage and initialization.
Let me try a different approach to understand the User class and its deleted field usage.
Setting insertable = false on deleted field appears to be a database-driven soft delete pattern
The deleted field configuration in the User entity suggests a common soft delete pattern where:
- The database column "Deleted" likely has a DEFAULT value set to false
- The field is excluded from INSERT statements (
insertable = false) - But can be updated later for soft deletion (
updatable = true)
This is a standard and safe implementation for soft delete functionality where:
- New users are always created with
deleted = falsethrough the database default - The field can be updated to
truewhen performing soft deletes - The JPA entity respects the database default by not including this field in inserts
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for the usage of 'deleted' field in entity classes.
rg '@Column.*name\s*=\s*"Deleted"'
Length of output: 158
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for constructor, setter, or any initialization of the deleted field
ast-grep --pattern 'class User {
$$$
private Boolean deleted;
$$$
}'
# Search for any SQL related configurations or default values
rg -B2 -A2 "Deleted.*DEFAULT"
Length of output: 2530
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get the full User class content to understand the context
cat src/main/java/com/iemr/common/bengen/data/user/User.java
# Search for any database schema files or SQL scripts that might define the Deleted column
fd -e sql -x cat {}
Length of output: 684
| public ResponseEntity<String> validateJwtToken(HttpServletRequest request) { | ||
| Optional<String> jwtTokenOpt = cookieUtil.getCookieValue(request, "Jwttoken"); | ||
|
|
||
| if (jwtTokenOpt.isEmpty()) { | ||
| return ResponseEntity.status(HttpStatus.UNAUTHORIZED) | ||
| .body("Error 401: Unauthorized - JWT Token is not set!"); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| String jwtToken = jwtTokenOpt.get(); | ||
|
|
||
| // Validate the token | ||
| Claims claims = jwtUtil.validateToken(jwtToken); | ||
| if (claims == null) { | ||
| return ResponseEntity.status(HttpStatus.UNAUTHORIZED).body("Error 401: Unauthorized - Invalid JWT Token!"); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // Extract username from token | ||
| String usernameFromToken = claims.getSubject(); | ||
| if (usernameFromToken == null || usernameFromToken.isEmpty()) { | ||
| return ResponseEntity.status(HttpStatus.UNAUTHORIZED) | ||
| .body("Error 401: Unauthorized - Username is missing!"); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // Return the username if valid | ||
| return ResponseEntity.ok(usernameFromToken); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure secure handling of JWT tokens and avoid sensitive information leakage
In the validateJwtToken method:
- Security Concerns:
- Storing JWT tokens in cookies can expose the application to cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks. Ensure that cookies are marked with
HttpOnlyandSecureflags to mitigate this risk. - Returning detailed error messages like "Error 401: Unauthorized - JWT Token is not set!" can provide useful information to attackers. Consider using generic error messages for clients and logging detailed messages on the server side.
- Storing JWT tokens in cookies can expose the application to cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks. Ensure that cookies are marked with
| logger.error("Validation failed: " + e.getMessage(), e); | ||
| throw new Exception("Validation error: " + e.getMessage(), e); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Avoid catching and throwing generic Exception
Catching and throwing the generic Exception can obscure the real cause of errors and make debugging difficult.
Refactor to catch specific exceptions and consider creating custom exception classes for better error handling.
Apply this diff to improve exception handling:
-} catch (Exception e) {
+} catch (NumberFormatException e) {
+ logger.error("User ID format is invalid: " + e.getMessage(), e);
+ throw new ValidationException("Invalid User ID format.", e);
+} catch (JwtException e) {
+ logger.error("JWT validation failed: " + e.getMessage(), e);
+ throw new ValidationException("Invalid JWT token.", e);
+} catch (Exception e) {
logger.error("Validation failed: " + e.getMessage(), e);
- throw new Exception("Validation error: " + e.getMessage(), e);
+ throw new ValidationException("Validation error: " + e.getMessage(), e);
}Ensure that ValidationException is a custom exception that appropriately represents validation errors.
Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| public boolean validateUserIdAndJwtToken(String jwtToken) throws Exception { | ||
| try { | ||
| // Validate JWT token and extract claims | ||
| Claims claims = jwtUtil.validateToken(jwtToken); | ||
|
|
||
| if (claims == null) { | ||
| throw new Exception("Invalid JWT token."); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| String userId = claims.get("userId", String.class); | ||
|
|
||
| // Fetch user based on userId from the database or cache | ||
| User user = generateBeneficiaryService.getUserById(Long.parseLong(userId)); | ||
| if (user == null) { | ||
| throw new Exception("Invalid User ID."); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return true; // Valid userId and JWT token | ||
| } catch (Exception e) { | ||
| logger.error("Validation failed: " + e.getMessage(), e); | ||
| throw new Exception("Validation error: " + e.getMessage(), e); | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Handle potential null and format exceptions when parsing userId
In the validateUserIdAndJwtToken method:
- The
userIdclaim might be missing or not a valid number, leading to aNumberFormatExceptionwhen parsing. - There is no null check for
userIdbefore parsing it withLong.parseLong(userId).
Apply this diff to add null checks and handle parsing exceptions:
public boolean validateUserIdAndJwtToken(String jwtToken) throws Exception {
try {
// Validate JWT token and extract claims
Claims claims = jwtUtil.validateToken(jwtToken);
if (claims == null) {
throw new Exception("Invalid JWT token.");
}
String userId = claims.get("userId", String.class);
+ if (userId == null || userId.isEmpty()) {
+ throw new Exception("User ID is missing in token.");
+ }
+ Long userIdLong;
+ try {
+ userIdLong = Long.parseLong(userId);
+ } catch (NumberFormatException e) {
+ throw new Exception("Invalid User ID format.");
+ }
// Fetch user based on userId from the database or cache
- User user = generateBeneficiaryService.getUserById(Long.parseLong(userId));
+ User user = generateBeneficiaryService.getUserById(userIdLong);
if (user == null) {
throw new Exception("Invalid User ID.");
}
return true; // Valid userId and JWT token
} catch (Exception e) {
logger.error("Validation failed: " + e.getMessage(), e);
throw new Exception("Validation error: " + e.getMessage(), e);
}
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| public boolean validateUserIdAndJwtToken(String jwtToken) throws Exception { | |
| try { | |
| // Validate JWT token and extract claims | |
| Claims claims = jwtUtil.validateToken(jwtToken); | |
| if (claims == null) { | |
| throw new Exception("Invalid JWT token."); | |
| } | |
| String userId = claims.get("userId", String.class); | |
| // Fetch user based on userId from the database or cache | |
| User user = generateBeneficiaryService.getUserById(Long.parseLong(userId)); | |
| if (user == null) { | |
| throw new Exception("Invalid User ID."); | |
| } | |
| return true; // Valid userId and JWT token | |
| } catch (Exception e) { | |
| logger.error("Validation failed: " + e.getMessage(), e); | |
| throw new Exception("Validation error: " + e.getMessage(), e); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| public boolean validateUserIdAndJwtToken(String jwtToken) throws Exception { | |
| try { | |
| // Validate JWT token and extract claims | |
| Claims claims = jwtUtil.validateToken(jwtToken); | |
| if (claims == null) { | |
| throw new Exception("Invalid JWT token."); | |
| } | |
| String userId = claims.get("userId", String.class); | |
| if (userId == null || userId.isEmpty()) { | |
| throw new Exception("User ID is missing in token."); | |
| } | |
| Long userIdLong; | |
| try { | |
| userIdLong = Long.parseLong(userId); | |
| } catch (NumberFormatException e) { | |
| throw new Exception("Invalid User ID format."); | |
| } | |
| // Fetch user based on userId from the database or cache | |
| User user = generateBeneficiaryService.getUserById(userIdLong); | |
| if (user == null) { | |
| throw new Exception("Invalid User ID."); | |
| } | |
| return true; // Valid userId and JWT token | |
| } catch (Exception e) { | |
| logger.error("Validation failed: " + e.getMessage(), e); | |
| throw new Exception("Validation error: " + e.getMessage(), e); | |
| } | |
| } |
| // Retrieve JWT token from cookies | ||
| String jwtTokenFromCookie = getJwtTokenFromCookies(request); | ||
| logger.info("JWT token from cookie: "); | ||
|
|
||
| // Determine which token (cookie or header) to validate | ||
| String jwtToken = jwtTokenFromCookie != null ? jwtTokenFromCookie : jwtTokenFromHeader; | ||
| if (jwtToken == null) { | ||
| response.sendError(HttpServletResponse.SC_UNAUTHORIZED, "JWT token not found in cookies or headers"); | ||
| return; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Handle missing JWT tokens more securely
When the JWT token is missing, providing detailed error messages may expose sensitive information.
Provide generic error messages and ensure logging is used for detailed information.
Apply this diff to adjust the error handling:
if (jwtToken == null) {
- response.sendError(HttpServletResponse.SC_UNAUTHORIZED, "JWT token not found in cookies or headers");
+ response.sendError(HttpServletResponse.SC_UNAUTHORIZED, "Unauthorized access");
return;
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| // Retrieve JWT token from cookies | |
| String jwtTokenFromCookie = getJwtTokenFromCookies(request); | |
| logger.info("JWT token from cookie: "); | |
| // Determine which token (cookie or header) to validate | |
| String jwtToken = jwtTokenFromCookie != null ? jwtTokenFromCookie : jwtTokenFromHeader; | |
| if (jwtToken == null) { | |
| response.sendError(HttpServletResponse.SC_UNAUTHORIZED, "JWT token not found in cookies or headers"); | |
| return; | |
| } | |
| // Retrieve JWT token from cookies | |
| String jwtTokenFromCookie = getJwtTokenFromCookies(request); | |
| logger.info("JWT token from cookie: "); | |
| // Determine which token (cookie or header) to validate | |
| String jwtToken = jwtTokenFromCookie != null ? jwtTokenFromCookie : jwtTokenFromHeader; | |
| if (jwtToken == null) { | |
| response.sendError(HttpServletResponse.SC_UNAUTHORIZED, "Unauthorized access"); | |
| return; | |
| } |
| [email protected]_GENERATION_API_LOGGING_FILE_NAME@ | ||
| [email protected]_SECRET_KEY@ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Strengthen JWT secret configuration and validation
Based on the code analysis:
- The JWT implementation uses HMAC-SHA256 (HS256) which requires at least a 256-bit (32-byte) secret key
- The current properties files have empty JWT secrets (
jwt.secret=) - The code has basic validation for null/empty secrets but no length or complexity validation
- The secret is directly used as bytes without proper Base64 decoding
Action items:
- Ensure the
JWT_SECRET_KEYenvironment variable is set with a Base64-encoded random key of at least 32 bytes - Update
JwtUtil.getSigningKey()to decode the Base64 secret before using it - Add validation for minimum secret length and proper Base64 format
- Configure non-empty secrets in all environment property files
🔗 Analysis chain
Ensure JWT secret meets security requirements
While using environment variables for JWT secrets is a good practice, please ensure that:
- The secret key is at least 256 bits (32 characters) long
- The secret is randomly generated using a cryptographically secure method
- Different secrets are used for different environments
Let's verify the JWT secret configuration:
Let me gather more information about the JWT configuration and usage in the codebase.
Let me check the JWT implementation to understand how the secret is being used.
Let me check the token generation implementation to understand how the secret is being used.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for JWT secret configuration across all property files
fd -e properties | xargs grep -l "jwt.secret"
# Verify if the secret is properly configured in other environments
fd -e properties | xargs grep "jwt.secret"
Length of output: 390
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for JWT token generation/validation code
ast-grep --pattern 'new $_(jwt.secret)'
# Search for JWT related configuration and usage
rg -l "JWT|jwt" --type java
# Check if there are any default or hardcoded JWT secrets
rg -i "jwt.*secret.*=" --type-add 'props:*.properties' --type props
Length of output: 3126
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check JWT implementation
rg -A 10 "class JwtUtil" src/main/java/com/iemr/common/bengen/utils/JwtUtil.java
# Check for secret key usage in JWT related files
rg "getProperty.*jwt.secret" src/main/java/com/iemr/common/bengen/utils/
# Look for JWT token generation
rg "generateToken|createToken" src/main/java/com/iemr/common/bengen/utils/JwtUtil.java
Length of output: 690
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check token generation implementation
rg -A 15 "generateToken" src/main/java/com/iemr/common/bengen/utils/JwtUtil.java
# Check for any validation or checks on the secret key
rg -A 10 "getSigningKey" src/main/java/com/iemr/common/bengen/utils/JwtUtil.java
# Look for any secret key validation or configuration in the application startup
rg "SECRET_KEY" src/main/java/com/iemr/common/bengen/utils/
Length of output: 2428
| package com.iemr.common.bengen.utils; | ||
|
|
||
| import java.util.Arrays; | ||
| import java.util.Optional; | ||
|
|
||
| import org.springframework.stereotype.Service; | ||
|
|
||
| import jakarta.servlet.http.Cookie; | ||
| import jakarta.servlet.http.HttpServletRequest; | ||
| import jakarta.servlet.http.HttpServletResponse; | ||
|
|
||
| @Service | ||
| public class CookieUtil { | ||
|
|
||
| public Optional<String> getCookieValue(HttpServletRequest request, String cookieName) { | ||
| Cookie[] cookies = request.getCookies(); | ||
| if (cookies != null) { | ||
| for (Cookie cookie : cookies) { | ||
| if (cookieName.equals(cookie.getName())) { | ||
| return Optional.of(cookie.getValue()); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| return Optional.empty(); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| public String getJwtTokenFromCookie(HttpServletRequest request) { | ||
| return Arrays.stream(request.getCookies()).filter(cookie -> "Jwttoken".equals(cookie.getName())) | ||
| .map(Cookie::getValue).findFirst().orElse(null); | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
JWT implementation requires security improvements
The verification revealed several security concerns that need to be addressed:
- Token validation in
JwtUtil.javareturns null on validation failure instead of throwing specific exceptions, which could lead to silent failures - No CSRF protection was found in the codebase
- JWT token expiration is implemented but error handling for expired tokens needs improvement
- The signing key mechanism needs review as it's not visible in the current implementation
Required changes:
- Implement proper exception handling for JWT validation failures (expired, malformed, invalid signature)
- Add CSRF protection mechanism
- Enhance error responses with specific status codes and messages for different token validation scenarios
- Review and secure the signing key management
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify complete JWT implementation security
Please ensure the following security aspects are properly implemented:
- JWT token expiration
- Token signature verification
- CSRF protection
- Proper error responses for invalid tokens
Let's verify the JWT implementation:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for proper JWT validation implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ implements $_ {
$$$
verify($_, $_) {
$$$
}
$$$
}'
# Check for CSRF protection
rg -l "csrf"
# Check for proper error handling
ast-grep --pattern 'try {
$$$
} catch (JWT$_ $_) {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 5013
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find JWT related implementations
rg -l "jwt|JWT" --type java
# Search for token validation patterns
rg "verify|validate.*token" --type java -A 3
# Look for security configurations
fd "SecurityConfig|WebSecurityConfig" --type f --extension java
# Check for token expiration handling
rg "expir|setExpiration" --type java -A 2
Length of output: 7371
| private Key getSigningKey() { | ||
| if (SECRET_KEY == null || SECRET_KEY.isEmpty()) { | ||
| throw new IllegalStateException("JWT secret key is not set in application.properties"); | ||
| } | ||
| return Keys.hmacShaKeyFor(SECRET_KEY.getBytes()); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add validation for minimum secret key length
While the method checks for null/empty secret key, it should also validate the minimum length to ensure adequate security. HMAC-SHA256 requires at least 256 bits (32 bytes) of key material for optimal security.
private Key getSigningKey() {
if (SECRET_KEY == null || SECRET_KEY.isEmpty()) {
throw new IllegalStateException("JWT secret key is not set in application.properties");
}
+ if (SECRET_KEY.getBytes().length < 32) {
+ throw new IllegalStateException("JWT secret key must be at least 32 bytes long");
+ }
return Keys.hmacShaKeyFor(SECRET_KEY.getBytes());
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| private Key getSigningKey() { | |
| if (SECRET_KEY == null || SECRET_KEY.isEmpty()) { | |
| throw new IllegalStateException("JWT secret key is not set in application.properties"); | |
| } | |
| return Keys.hmacShaKeyFor(SECRET_KEY.getBytes()); | |
| } | |
| private Key getSigningKey() { | |
| if (SECRET_KEY == null || SECRET_KEY.isEmpty()) { | |
| throw new IllegalStateException("JWT secret key is not set in application.properties"); | |
| } | |
| if (SECRET_KEY.getBytes().length < 32) { | |
| throw new IllegalStateException("JWT secret key must be at least 32 bytes long"); | |
| } | |
| return Keys.hmacShaKeyFor(SECRET_KEY.getBytes()); | |
| } |
| public Claims validateToken(String token) { | ||
| try { | ||
| // Use the JwtParserBuilder correctly in version 0.12.6 | ||
| return Jwts.parser() // Correct method in 0.12.6 to get JwtParserBuilder | ||
| .setSigningKey(getSigningKey()) // Set the signing key | ||
| .build() // Build the JwtParser | ||
| .parseClaimsJws(token) // Parse and validate the token | ||
| .getBody(); | ||
| } catch (Exception e) { | ||
| return null; // Handle token parsing/validation errors | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Improve token validation error handling
The current implementation returns null for all validation failures, making it difficult to handle specific error cases (expired token, invalid signature, etc.). Consider throwing specific exceptions or returning a validation result object.
-public Claims validateToken(String token) {
+public TokenValidationResult validateToken(String token) {
try {
- return Jwts.parser()
+ Claims claims = Jwts.parser()
.setSigningKey(getSigningKey())
.build()
.parseClaimsJws(token)
.getBody();
+ return new TokenValidationResult(true, claims, null);
} catch (ExpiredJwtException e) {
- return null;
+ return new TokenValidationResult(false, null, "Token has expired");
} catch (SignatureException e) {
+ return new TokenValidationResult(false, null, "Invalid token signature");
} catch (Exception e) {
- return null;
+ return new TokenValidationResult(false, null, "Invalid token: " + e.getMessage());
}
}Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| public String extractUsername(String token) { | ||
| return extractClaim(token, Claims::getSubject); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| public <T> T extractClaim(String token, Function<Claims, T> claimsResolver) { | ||
| final Claims claims = extractAllClaims(token); | ||
| return claimsResolver.apply(claims); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| private Claims extractAllClaims(String token) { | ||
| return Jwts.parser().setSigningKey(getSigningKey()).build().parseClaimsJws(token).getBody(); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Refactor duplicate code and add input validation
The claim extraction methods contain duplicate code from validateToken and lack input validation. Consider refactoring to reduce duplication and add proper validation.
+private void validateInput(String token) {
+ if (token == null || token.trim().isEmpty()) {
+ throw new IllegalArgumentException("Token cannot be null or empty");
+ }
+}
public String extractUsername(String token) {
+ validateInput(token);
return extractClaim(token, Claims::getSubject);
}
public <T> T extractClaim(String token, Function<Claims, T> claimsResolver) {
+ validateInput(token);
final Claims claims = extractAllClaims(token);
return claimsResolver.apply(claims);
}
private Claims extractAllClaims(String token) {
- return Jwts.parser().setSigningKey(getSigningKey()).build().parseClaimsJws(token).getBody();
+ return validateToken(token).getClaims();
}Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| public String generateToken(String username, String userId) { | ||
| Date now = new Date(); | ||
| Date expiryDate = new Date(now.getTime() + EXPIRATION_TIME); | ||
|
|
||
| // Include the userId in the JWT claims | ||
| return Jwts.builder().setSubject(username).claim("userId", userId) // Add userId as a claim | ||
| .setIssuedAt(now).setExpiration(expiryDate).signWith(getSigningKey(), SignatureAlgorithm.HS256) | ||
| .compact(); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance token with standard JWT claims
Consider adding standard JWT claims to improve token security and manageability:
jti(JWT ID) for token uniquenessiss(Issuer) for token originaud(Audience) for intended recipients
public String generateToken(String username, String userId) {
Date now = new Date();
Date expiryDate = new Date(now.getTime() + EXPIRATION_TIME);
+ String tokenId = UUID.randomUUID().toString();
return Jwts.builder()
.setSubject(username)
.claim("userId", userId)
+ .setId(tokenId)
+ .setIssuer("bengen-api")
+ .setAudience("bengen-clients")
.setIssuedAt(now)
.setExpiration(expiryDate)
.signWith(getSigningKey(), SignatureAlgorithm.HS256)
.compact();
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| public String generateToken(String username, String userId) { | |
| Date now = new Date(); | |
| Date expiryDate = new Date(now.getTime() + EXPIRATION_TIME); | |
| // Include the userId in the JWT claims | |
| return Jwts.builder().setSubject(username).claim("userId", userId) // Add userId as a claim | |
| .setIssuedAt(now).setExpiration(expiryDate).signWith(getSigningKey(), SignatureAlgorithm.HS256) | |
| .compact(); | |
| } | |
| public String generateToken(String username, String userId) { | |
| Date now = new Date(); | |
| Date expiryDate = new Date(now.getTime() + EXPIRATION_TIME); | |
| String tokenId = UUID.randomUUID().toString(); | |
| return Jwts.builder() | |
| .setSubject(username) | |
| .claim("userId", userId) | |
| .setId(tokenId) | |
| .setIssuer("bengen-api") | |
| .setAudience("bengen-clients") | |
| .setIssuedAt(now) | |
| .setExpiration(expiryDate) | |
| .signWith(getSigningKey(), SignatureAlgorithm.HS256) | |
| .compact(); | |
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 7
♻️ Duplicate comments (2)
src/main/java/com/iemr/common/bengen/utils/JwtAuthenticationUtil.java (2)
38-63:⚠️ Potential issueEnhance security measures for JWT handling
The current implementation has several security concerns:
- Detailed error messages could aid attackers in understanding the system
- No visible CSRF protection for cookie handling
- Cookie security attributes not specified
Apply this diff to implement more secure error handling:
if (jwtTokenOpt.isEmpty()) { return ResponseEntity.status(HttpStatus.UNAUTHORIZED) - .body("Error 401: Unauthorized - JWT Token is not set!"); + .body("Authentication failed"); } String jwtToken = jwtTokenOpt.get(); // Validate the token Claims claims = jwtUtil.validateToken(jwtToken); if (claims == null) { return ResponseEntity.status(HttpStatus.UNAUTHORIZED) - .body("Error 401: Unauthorized - Invalid JWT Token!"); + .body("Authentication failed"); } // Extract username from token String usernameFromToken = claims.getSubject(); if (usernameFromToken == null || usernameFromToken.isEmpty()) { return ResponseEntity.status(HttpStatus.UNAUTHORIZED) - .body("Error 401: Unauthorized - Username is missing!"); + .body("Authentication failed"); }Additionally:
- Ensure
CookieUtilsets appropriate security attributes (HttpOnly, Secure, SameSite)- Implement CSRF protection
- Consider adding rate limiting for this endpoint
65-87:⚠️ Potential issueImprove validation and exception handling
The current implementation needs several improvements:
- Missing null check for userId
- Generic exception handling masks specific issues
- No token expiration validation
Apply this diff to enhance the implementation:
public boolean validateUserIdAndJwtToken(String jwtToken) throws Exception { try { + if (jwtToken == null || jwtToken.trim().isEmpty()) { + throw new IllegalArgumentException("JWT token cannot be null or empty"); + } + // Validate JWT token and extract claims Claims claims = jwtUtil.validateToken(jwtToken); if (claims == null) { - throw new Exception("Invalid JWT token."); + throw new JwtValidationException("Invalid JWT token"); } String userId = claims.get("userId", String.class); + if (userId == null || userId.trim().isEmpty()) { + throw new JwtValidationException("User ID not found in token"); + } + // Validate token expiration + if (claims.getExpiration() != null && claims.getExpiration().before(new Date())) { + throw new JwtValidationException("Token has expired"); + } // Check if user data is present in Redis User user = getUserFromCache(userId); if (user == null) { - throw new Exception("Invalid User ID."); + throw new UserNotFoundException("User not found: " + userId); } return true; // Valid userId and JWT token - } catch (Exception e) { + } catch (JwtValidationException | UserNotFoundException e) { + throw e; + } catch (Exception e) { logger.error("Validation failed: " + e.getMessage(), e); - throw new Exception("Validation error: " + e.getMessage(), e); + throw new AuthenticationException("Authentication failed", e); } }Consider creating these custom exceptions:
public class JwtValidationException extends Exception { public JwtValidationException(String message) { super(message); } } public class UserNotFoundException extends Exception { public UserNotFoundException(String message) { super(message); } } public class AuthenticationException extends Exception { public AuthenticationException(String message, Throwable cause) { super(message, cause); } }
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/main/java/com/iemr/common/bengen/data/user/User.java (1)
22-23: Standardize column naming conventionColumn naming is inconsistent:
UserIDvsuserName. Standardize to either camelCase or snake_case:-@Column(name = "UserID") +@Column(name = "user_id") private Long userID; -@Column(name = "userName") +@Column(name = "user_name") private String userName;Also applies to: 25-26
src/main/java/com/iemr/common/bengen/config/RedisConfig.java (1)
24-37: Configure cache TTL and connection poolingThe Redis template configuration is missing important production-ready settings:
- Cache TTL for user sessions
- Connection pool configuration
- Key prefix strategy
- Error handling
Consider adding these configurations:
@Bean public RedisCacheConfiguration cacheConfiguration() { return RedisCacheConfiguration.defaultCacheConfig() .entryTtl(Duration.ofMinutes(30)) .prefixCacheNameWith("bengen:") .serializeValuesWith(RedisSerializationContext.SerializationPair .fromSerializer(new Jackson2JsonRedisSerializer<>(User.class))); } @Bean public LettuceConnectionFactory redisConnectionFactory() { LettucePoolingClientConfiguration poolConfig = LettucePoolingClientConfiguration.builder() .poolConfig(new GenericObjectPoolConfig()) .build(); RedisStandaloneConfiguration serverConfig = new RedisStandaloneConfiguration(); serverConfig.setPassword("${spring.redis.password}"); return new LettuceConnectionFactory(serverConfig, poolConfig); }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
src/main/java/com/iemr/common/bengen/BeneficiaryGenApplication.java(2 hunks)src/main/java/com/iemr/common/bengen/config/RedisConfig.java(1 hunks)src/main/java/com/iemr/common/bengen/data/user/User.java(1 hunks)src/main/java/com/iemr/common/bengen/service/GenerateBeneficiaryService.java(2 hunks)src/main/java/com/iemr/common/bengen/utils/JwtAuthenticationUtil.java(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- src/main/java/com/iemr/common/bengen/service/GenerateBeneficiaryService.java
| public class User implements Serializable { | ||
| @Id | ||
| @GeneratedValue(strategy = GenerationType.IDENTITY) | ||
| @Column(name = "UserID") | ||
| private Long userID; | ||
|
|
||
| @Column(name = "userName") | ||
| private String userName; | ||
| @Column(name = "Deleted", insertable = false, updatable = true) | ||
| private Boolean deleted; | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add essential fields for JWT authentication and security
The User entity is missing crucial fields needed for JWT authentication and security audit. Consider adding:
- Password/credentials field (hashed)
- Audit fields (createdAt, modifiedAt)
- Version field for optimistic locking
- Role/permissions for JWT claims
Would you like me to provide a complete implementation with these security enhancements?
| @Data | ||
| @JsonIgnoreProperties(ignoreUnknown = true) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Replace @DaTa with more specific Lombok annotations
Using @Data with JPA entities can lead to issues with equals/hashCode implementations. Consider using more specific annotations:
-@Data
+@Getter
+@Setter
+@ToString(exclude = "deleted")
+@EqualsAndHashCode(of = "userID")📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| @Data | |
| @JsonIgnoreProperties(ignoreUnknown = true) | |
| @Getter | |
| @Setter | |
| @ToString(exclude = "deleted") | |
| @EqualsAndHashCode(of = "userID") | |
| @JsonIgnoreProperties(ignoreUnknown = true) |
| @Bean | ||
| public ConfigureRedisAction configureRedisAction() { | ||
| return ConfigureRedisAction.NO_OP; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Redis security configuration needs improvement
The Redis configuration has critical security gaps:
- Empty password configuration (
spring.redis.password=) - No SSL/TLS configuration
- Default port (6379) is exposed
- Host configuration is commented out
Action items:
- Configure a strong Redis password
- Enable SSL/TLS for encrypted communication
- Consider using a non-default port
- Ensure host configuration is properly set
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify Redis security configuration
Using ConfigureRedisAction.NO_OP bypasses Redis configuration commands. Ensure Redis server is properly secured:
- Password authentication
- SSL/TLS encryption
- Network security
Let's check the content of the application.properties file to verify the Redis security configuration.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if Redis security properties are defined
rg -l "spring\.redis\.(password|ssl|sentinel)"
Length of output: 90
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check Redis configuration in application.properties
rg "spring\.redis\." src/main/resources/application.properties -A 2
Length of output: 255
| @Bean | ||
| public RedisTemplate<String, Object> redisTemplate(RedisConnectionFactory factory) { | ||
| RedisTemplate<String, Object> template = new RedisTemplate<>(); | ||
| template.setConnectionFactory(factory); | ||
|
|
||
| // Use StringRedisSerializer for keys (userId) | ||
| template.setKeySerializer(new StringRedisSerializer()); | ||
|
|
||
| // Use Jackson2JsonRedisSerializer for values (Users objects) | ||
| Jackson2JsonRedisSerializer<User> serializer = new Jackson2JsonRedisSerializer<>(User.class); | ||
| template.setValueSerializer(serializer); | ||
|
|
||
| return template; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove redundant Redis configuration
This Redis template configuration duplicates the one in RedisConfig.java with inconsistent types:
RedisTemplate<String, Object>vsRedisTemplate<String, User>- Same serialization setup in both places
Remove this redundant configuration and use the one from RedisConfig.java to maintain a single source of truth.
| Jackson2JsonRedisSerializer<User> serializer = new Jackson2JsonRedisSerializer<>(User.class); | ||
| template.setValueSerializer(serializer); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix type mismatch in serializer configuration
The serializer is configured for User class but the template is for Object:
-Jackson2JsonRedisSerializer<User> serializer = new Jackson2JsonRedisSerializer<>(User.class);
-template.setValueSerializer(serializer);
+template.setValueSerializer(new Jackson2JsonRedisSerializer<>(Object.class));Or better yet, remove this configuration and use the properly typed one from RedisConfig.java.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| Jackson2JsonRedisSerializer<User> serializer = new Jackson2JsonRedisSerializer<>(User.class); | |
| template.setValueSerializer(serializer); | |
| template.setValueSerializer(new Jackson2JsonRedisSerializer<>(Object.class)); |
| @Autowired | ||
| private CookieUtil cookieUtil; | ||
| @Autowired | ||
| private JwtUtil jwtUtil; | ||
| @Autowired | ||
| private RedisTemplate<String, Object> redisTemplate; | ||
| private final Logger logger = LoggerFactory.getLogger(this.getClass().getName()); | ||
|
|
||
| @Autowired | ||
| private GenerateBeneficiaryService generateBeneficiaryService; | ||
|
|
||
| public JwtAuthenticationUtil(CookieUtil cookieUtil, JwtUtil jwtUtil) { | ||
| this.cookieUtil = cookieUtil; | ||
| this.jwtUtil = jwtUtil; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Standardize dependency injection pattern
The class mixes constructor injection with field injection, which could lead to initialization issues. Consider using constructor injection consistently for all dependencies.
Apply this diff to standardize the injection pattern:
- @Autowired
- private CookieUtil cookieUtil;
- @Autowired
- private JwtUtil jwtUtil;
- @Autowired
- private RedisTemplate<String, Object> redisTemplate;
private final Logger logger = LoggerFactory.getLogger(this.getClass().getName());
- @Autowired
- private GenerateBeneficiaryService generateBeneficiaryService;
- public JwtAuthenticationUtil(CookieUtil cookieUtil, JwtUtil jwtUtil) {
+ public JwtAuthenticationUtil(
+ CookieUtil cookieUtil,
+ JwtUtil jwtUtil,
+ RedisTemplate<String, Object> redisTemplate,
+ GenerateBeneficiaryService generateBeneficiaryService) {
this.cookieUtil = cookieUtil;
this.jwtUtil = jwtUtil;
+ this.redisTemplate = redisTemplate;
+ this.generateBeneficiaryService = generateBeneficiaryService;
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| @Autowired | |
| private CookieUtil cookieUtil; | |
| @Autowired | |
| private JwtUtil jwtUtil; | |
| @Autowired | |
| private RedisTemplate<String, Object> redisTemplate; | |
| private final Logger logger = LoggerFactory.getLogger(this.getClass().getName()); | |
| @Autowired | |
| private GenerateBeneficiaryService generateBeneficiaryService; | |
| public JwtAuthenticationUtil(CookieUtil cookieUtil, JwtUtil jwtUtil) { | |
| this.cookieUtil = cookieUtil; | |
| this.jwtUtil = jwtUtil; | |
| } | |
| private CookieUtil cookieUtil; | |
| private JwtUtil jwtUtil; | |
| private RedisTemplate<String, Object> redisTemplate; | |
| private final Logger logger = LoggerFactory.getLogger(this.getClass().getName()); | |
| private GenerateBeneficiaryService generateBeneficiaryService; | |
| public JwtAuthenticationUtil( | |
| CookieUtil cookieUtil, | |
| JwtUtil jwtUtil, | |
| RedisTemplate<String, Object> redisTemplate, | |
| GenerateBeneficiaryService generateBeneficiaryService) { | |
| this.cookieUtil = cookieUtil; | |
| this.jwtUtil = jwtUtil; | |
| this.redisTemplate = redisTemplate; | |
| this.generateBeneficiaryService = generateBeneficiaryService; | |
| } |
| private User getUserFromCache(String userId) { | ||
| String redisKey = "user_" + userId; // The Redis key format | ||
| User user = (User) redisTemplate.opsForValue().get(redisKey); | ||
|
|
||
| if (user == null) { | ||
| logger.warn("User not found in Redis. Will try to fetch from DB."); | ||
| } else { | ||
| logger.info("User fetched successfully from Redis."); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return user; // Returns null if not found | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance Redis cache implementation
The current cache implementation has several areas for improvement:
- Direct string concatenation for Redis keys
- No namespace/prefix strategy for multi-tenant scenarios
- Unchecked cast when retrieving from Redis
Apply this diff to improve the implementation:
+ private static final String USER_CACHE_PREFIX = "bengen:user:";
+
private User getUserFromCache(String userId) {
- String redisKey = "user_" + userId; // The Redis key format
- User user = (User) redisTemplate.opsForValue().get(redisKey);
+ String redisKey = USER_CACHE_PREFIX + userId;
+ Object cachedValue = redisTemplate.opsForValue().get(redisKey);
+
+ User user = null;
+ if (cachedValue instanceof User) {
+ user = (User) cachedValue;
+ } else if (cachedValue != null) {
+ logger.error("Cached value is not of type User: {}", cachedValue.getClass());
+ }
if (user == null) {
- logger.warn("User not found in Redis. Will try to fetch from DB.");
+ logger.debug("Cache miss for user: {}", userId);
} else {
- logger.info("User fetched successfully from Redis.");
+ logger.debug("Cache hit for user: {}", userId);
}
return user;
}Consider also:
- Adding TTL (Time-To-Live) for cached users
- Implementing cache update/invalidation strategy
- Adding metrics for cache hit/miss rates
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| private User getUserFromCache(String userId) { | |
| String redisKey = "user_" + userId; // The Redis key format | |
| User user = (User) redisTemplate.opsForValue().get(redisKey); | |
| if (user == null) { | |
| logger.warn("User not found in Redis. Will try to fetch from DB."); | |
| } else { | |
| logger.info("User fetched successfully from Redis."); | |
| } | |
| return user; // Returns null if not found | |
| } | |
| private static final String USER_CACHE_PREFIX = "bengen:user:"; | |
| private User getUserFromCache(String userId) { | |
| String redisKey = USER_CACHE_PREFIX + userId; | |
| Object cachedValue = redisTemplate.opsForValue().get(redisKey); | |
| User user = null; | |
| if (cachedValue instanceof User) { | |
| user = (User) cachedValue; | |
| } else if (cachedValue != null) { | |
| logger.error("Cached value is not of type User: {}", cachedValue.getClass()); | |
| } | |
| if (user == null) { | |
| logger.debug("Cache miss for user: {}", userId); | |
| } else { | |
| logger.debug("Cache hit for user: {}", userId); | |
| } | |
| return user; | |
| } |
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
src/main/java/com/iemr/common/bengen/utils/JwtAuthenticationUtil.java (4)
24-32: Consider using constructor injection for all dependencies.Lines 24-35 mix field injection (
@Autowired) with partial constructor injection in lines 37-40. This can lead to inconsistencies and potential initialization problems.-@Autowired -private CookieUtil cookieUtil; -@Autowired -private JwtUtil jwtUtil; -@Autowired -private RedisTemplate<String, Object> redisTemplate; -@Autowired -private UserLoginRepo userLoginRepo; -@Autowired -private GenerateBeneficiaryService generateBeneficiaryService; +private final CookieUtil cookieUtil; +private final JwtUtil jwtUtil; +private final RedisTemplate<String, Object> redisTemplate; +private final UserLoginRepo userLoginRepo; +private final GenerateBeneficiaryService generateBeneficiaryService; @Autowired public JwtAuthenticationUtil(CookieUtil cookieUtil, JwtUtil jwtUtil, RedisTemplate<String, Object> redisTemplate, UserLoginRepo userLoginRepo, GenerateBeneficiaryService generateBeneficiaryService) { this.cookieUtil = cookieUtil; this.jwtUtil = jwtUtil; this.redisTemplate = redisTemplate; this.userLoginRepo = userLoginRepo; this.generateBeneficiaryService = generateBeneficiaryService; }
37-40: Remove redundant constructor or unify approach.Because you have field injection as well, the explicit constructor lines 37-40 become redundant or confusing. Decide whether to remove the constructor or unify everything into constructor-based injection.
42-67: Limit detailed error messages to avoid leaking system information.Returning messages like “Error 401: Unauthorized - JWT Token is not set!” can reveal internal logic for potential attackers. Consider responding with a generic error message and log the details server-side.
97-105: Add a namespace prefix for Redis keys to support multi-environment or multi-tenant usage.Line 98 uses
user_as a prefix. For improved maintainability, consider adding environment, application, or domain-based prefixes (e.g.,bengen:user:) to avoid collisions.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
src/main/java/com/iemr/common/bengen/repo/UserLoginRepo.java(1 hunks)src/main/java/com/iemr/common/bengen/utils/JwtAuthenticationUtil.java(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
src/main/java/com/iemr/common/bengen/repo/UserLoginRepo.java (2)
1-1: Use consistent package naming conventions and structure.
The package name com.iemr.common.bengen.repo seems sufficiently descriptive for a repository layer. However, ensure consistency with other packages in the application to maintain a coherent structure (e.g., repository vs repo, service vs services).
13-14: Verify null and invalid input handling in custom query methods.
Although the query checks u.deleted = false, consider how the application should handle scenarios where userID is null or invalid. Ensure that calling this method with an invalid ID does not throw unchecked exceptions.
src/main/java/com/iemr/common/bengen/utils/JwtAuthenticationUtil.java (2)
69-95: Avoid catching and rethrowing generic Exception.
This repeats a prior reviewer comment about obscuring the root cause. Use more specific exceptions (e.g., NumberFormatException, JwtException), or define a custom domain-specific exception to differentiate JWT issues from unexpected runtime errors.
110-128:
Handle potential exceptions for invalid userId more gracefully.
Line 115 calls Long.parseLong(userId) which can throw NumberFormatException. Ensure you handle invalid string inputs or null values before parsing. This helps avoid runtime exceptions.
+ if (userId == null || userId.trim().isEmpty()) {
+ logger.error("User ID is missing or empty.");
+ return null;
+ }
+
Long userIdLong;
try {
userIdLong = Long.parseLong(userId);
} catch (NumberFormatException e) {
logger.error("Invalid User ID format for: " + userId, e);
return null;
}
User user = userLoginRepo.getUserByUserID(userIdLong);Likely invalid or redundant comment.
📋 Description
JIRA ID:
Please provide a summary of the change and the motivation behind it. Include relevant context and details.
✅ Type of Change
ℹ️ Additional Information
Please describe how the changes were tested, and include any relevant screenshots, logs, or other information that provides additional context.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Userentity for database interactions.Bug Fixes
Documentation
Tests