AMM- 1049 | Assam Redis Issue #31
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@srishtigrp78 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 2 minutes and 54 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve updates to several GitHub workflow files and the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant HTTPRequestInterceptor
participant Validator
participant SessionObject
Client->>HTTPRequestInterceptor: Send HTTP Request
HTTPRequestInterceptor->>Validator: Validate Authorization Key
Validator-->>HTTPRequestInterceptor: Validation Result
alt Valid Key
HTTPRequestInterceptor->>SessionObject: Set Session Object
HTTPRequestInterceptor->>Client: Send Response
else Invalid Key
HTTPRequestInterceptor->>Client: Send Error Response
end
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 8
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/package.yml (1)
38-38: Fix trailing whitespace
The upgrade to upload-artifact@v3 is good, but there's a trailing whitespace at the end of line 38.
Apply this diff to fix:
- uses: actions/upload-artifact@v3
+ uses: actions/upload-artifact@v3🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 38-38: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
src/main/java/com/iemr/helpline104/utils/http/HTTPRequestInterceptor.java (1)
45-45: Use Fully Qualified Class Name for Logger Initialization
Using this.getClass().getName() provides the fully qualified class name, which can be more informative and helps distinguish between classes with the same name in different packages.
Adjust the logger initialization:
-Logger logger = LoggerFactory.getLogger(this.getClass().getSimpleName());
+Logger logger = LoggerFactory.getLogger(this.getClass().getName());📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
- .github/workflows/build-on-pull-request.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/package.yml (2 hunks)
- .github/workflows/sast.yml (1 hunks)
- src/main/java/com/iemr/helpline104/utils/http/HTTPRequestInterceptor.java (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint
.github/workflows/build-on-pull-request.yml
17-17: the runner of "actions/setup-java@v2" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
.github/workflows/package.yml
26-26: the runner of "actions/setup-java@v2" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
.github/workflows/sast.yml
41-41: the runner of "actions/setup-java@v2" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
🪛 yamllint
.github/workflows/package.yml
[error] 38-38: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
.github/workflows/sast.yml
[warning] 43-43: wrong indentation: expected 8 but found 10
(indentation)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
.github/workflows/build-on-pull-request.yml (1)
16-16: Verify application compatibility with JDK 17.
The upgrade from JDK 8 to 17 is a significant change that could impact the application. Please ensure:
- The application codebase is compatible with JDK 17
- All dependencies support JDK 17
- This change is coordinated with deployment environments
Also applies to: 19-19
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more specific information about the Java and Spring Boot versions to better assess JDK 17 compatibility.
JDK 17 upgrade is compatible with the project configuration
The project is already configured for Java 17 in pom.xml and uses Spring Boot 3.2.2, which requires JDK 17 as its baseline. This confirms that the JDK 17 setup in the GitHub Actions workflow is correct and aligned with the project's requirements.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for potential JDK compatibility issues
# Look for pom.xml files and check their Java version settings
fd pom.xml --exec grep -l "<java.version>" {} \;
# Look for Spring Boot version which might indicate Java compatibility
fd pom.xml --exec grep -l "spring-boot" {} \;
Length of output: 122
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get Java version and Spring Boot version details from pom.xml
echo "=== Java Version ==="
grep -A 1 "<java.version>" pom.xml
echo -e "\n=== Spring Boot Version ==="
grep -A 1 "<spring-boot" pom.xml
echo -e "\n=== Parent POM Info ==="
grep -A 3 "<parent>" pom.xml
Length of output: 500
.github/workflows/package.yml (1)
Line range hint 1-42: Verify JDK 17 compatibility
While upgrading to JDK 17 is generally good for security and features, please ensure that:
- All dependencies in pom.xml support Java 17
- The application code is compatible with Java 17
- The deployment environment supports Java 17
Let's check the Maven configuration:
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about Java dependencies and potential compatibility issues.
Let me check Spring Boot version and other core dependencies that might affect Java 17 compatibility.
JDK 17 compatibility is well-supported by project dependencies
The project is properly configured for Java 17 with compatible dependencies:
- Spring Boot 3.2.2 (requires Java 17+)
- All major dependencies are Java 17 compatible:
- Jackson 2.17.0
- Hibernate (via Spring Boot 3.x)
- MapStruct 1.5.5
- Spring Framework 6.1.12
- MySQL Connector 8.3.0
- Lombok (latest via Spring Boot)
The only suggestion would be to update maven-surefire-report-plugin from 2.20.1 to a newer version, but this isn't a blocking issue for Java 17 compatibility.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check Java version configuration in pom.xml
rg -A 5 '<java.version>' pom.xml
Length of output: 333
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for dependencies in pom.xml
rg -A 5 '<dependencies>' pom.xml
# Look for any Java version specific annotations or APIs
rg -g '*.java' '@since|@RequiresJava|@SupportedFrom'
# Search for potential Java version specific features
ast-grep --pattern 'sealed class $_ {$$$}'
# Check for any Maven plugins configuration
rg -A 5 '<plugin>' pom.xml
Length of output: 1602
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check Spring Boot version and parent
rg -A 5 '<parent>' pom.xml
# Check for specific version properties
rg '<.*\.version>' pom.xml
# Look for more dependencies
rg -A 3 '<groupId>' pom.xml
Length of output: 6380
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint
23-23: the runner of "actions/checkout@v2" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
26-26: the runner of "actions/setup-java@v2" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
🪛 yamllint
[warning] 22-22: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4
(indentation)
[error] 22-22: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 24-24: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 30-30: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
.github/workflows/sast.yml (1)
40-44: LGTM on JDK 17 upgrade, but verify compatibility.
The upgrade from JDK 8 to 17 is consistent with changes in other workflow files. However, ensure that:
- All dependencies and plugins in the Maven project support JDK 17
- CodeQL analysis is compatible with JDK 17
✅ Verification successful
JDK 17 upgrade is fully compatible with the project
The codebase is already configured for Java 17:
- Spring Boot parent version 3.2.2 (requires Java 17+)
- Explicit
<java.version>17</java.version>in pom.xml - All dependencies are compatible with Java 17, including:
- Modern versions of Spring dependencies
- Updated Jackson libraries
- Jakarta EE APIs instead of legacy javax
- Latest versions of other dependencies
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check Maven configuration for JDK 17 compatibility
# Test: Search for Maven compiler plugin configuration and Java version settings
rg -l "maven-compiler-plugin|<java.version>|<source>|<target>" pom.xml
# Test: Check for any explicit JDK version dependencies
rg "<version>(1\.[0-9]|[0-9]{2})</version>" pom.xml
Length of output: 134
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual content of pom.xml to see Java version settings
cat pom.xml
# Also check for any other pom files in the repository
fd pom.xml
# Check CodeQL workflow files for any Java-specific configurations
rg -A 5 -B 5 "java" .github/workflows/sast.yml
Length of output: 11840
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint
41-41: the runner of "actions/setup-java@v2" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
🪛 yamllint
[warning] 43-43: wrong indentation: expected 8 but found 10
(indentation)
src/main/java/com/iemr/helpline104/utils/http/HTTPRequestInterceptor.java (2)
125-125: Ensure Consistent Logging Levels Across Methods
The afterCompletion method uses logger.debug, ensuring consistency with other methods. Verify that this logging level aligns with your application's logging strategy.
112-112:
Avoid Logging Sensitive Information in Authorization Header
Similar to the earlier comment, logging the Authorization header can expose sensitive information. It's safer to omit it from logs.
Adjust the logging statement:
-logger.debug("RequestURI::" + request.getRequestURI() + " || Authorization ::" + authorization);
+logger.debug("RequestURI::" + request.getRequestURI());Likely invalid or redundant comment.
| @@ -13,10 +13,10 @@ jobs: | |||
| ref: ${{ github.event.pull_request.head.ref }} | |||
| repository: ${{ github.event.pull_request.head.repo.full_name }} | |||
|
|
|||
| - name: Setup JDK 8 | |||
| - name: Setup JDK 17 | |||
| uses: actions/setup-java@v2 | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Update actions/setup-java to v3.
The current version (@v2) is outdated. GitHub Actions recommends using the latest version for improved features and security.
Apply this diff:
- uses: actions/setup-java@v2
+ uses: actions/setup-java@v3📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| uses: actions/setup-java@v2 | |
| uses: actions/setup-java@v3 |
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint
17-17: the runner of "actions/setup-java@v2" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
| - name: Setup JDK 17 | ||
| uses: actions/setup-java@v2 | ||
| with: | ||
| java-version: 8 | ||
| java-version: 17 | ||
| distribution: 'adopt' | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Update actions/setup-java to v3
The action actions/setup-java@v2 is outdated. Version 3 is now available with improved features and security updates.
Apply this diff to upgrade:
- name: Setup JDK 17
- uses: actions/setup-java@v2
+ uses: actions/setup-java@v3
with:
java-version: 17
distribution: 'adopt'📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| - name: Setup JDK 17 | |
| uses: actions/setup-java@v2 | |
| with: | |
| java-version: 8 | |
| java-version: 17 | |
| distribution: 'adopt' | |
| - name: Setup JDK 17 | |
| uses: actions/setup-java@v3 | |
| with: | |
| java-version: 17 | |
| distribution: 'adopt' | |
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint
26-26: the runner of "actions/setup-java@v2" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
🪛 yamllint
[error] 30-30: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
| @@ -37,10 +37,10 @@ jobs: | |||
| - name: Initialize CodeQL | |||
| uses: github/codeql-action/init@v2 | |||
|
|
|||
| - name: Setup JDK 8 | |||
| - name: Setup JDK 17 | |||
| uses: actions/setup-java@v2 | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Update actions/setup-java to v3.
The current version (v2) of the setup-java action is outdated. Version 3 includes security updates and performance improvements.
Apply this diff to update the action:
- - name: Setup JDK 17
- uses: actions/setup-java@v2
+ - name: Setup JDK 17
+ uses: actions/setup-java@v3Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint
41-41: the runner of "actions/setup-java@v2" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
| String remoteAddress = request.getHeader("X-FORWARDED-FOR"); | ||
| if (remoteAddress == null || remoteAddress.trim().length() == 0) { | ||
| remoteAddress = request.getRemoteAddr(); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| validator.checkKeyExists(authorization, remoteAddress); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Validate 'X-FORWARDED-FOR' Header to Prevent Spoofing
The X-FORWARDED-FOR header can be manipulated by clients to spoof their IP addresses. Relying on it without validation may introduce security vulnerabilities.
Consider validating the IP address or using a trusted proxy for fetching the client's real IP. Alternatively, rely on request.getRemoteAddr() if the server is properly configured.
src/main/java/com/iemr/helpline104/utils/http/HTTPRequestInterceptor.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
| } | ||
| } catch (Exception e) { | ||
| logger.error(e.getLocalizedMessage()); | ||
|
|
||
| OutputResponse output = new OutputResponse(); | ||
| output.setError(e); | ||
| response.getOutputStream().print(output.toString()); | ||
| response.setContentType(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON); | ||
| response.setContentLength(output.toString().length()); | ||
| response.setHeader("Access-Control-Allow-Origin", "*"); | ||
| status = false; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Handle Exceptions Securely Without Exposing Internal Details
Directly returning exception details to the client can expose sensitive information. Instead, log the exception internally and return a generic error message with an appropriate HTTP status code.
Refactor the exception handling code:
} catch (Exception e) {
+ logger.error("Error in preHandle method", e); // Log the exception internally
OutputResponse output = new OutputResponse();
- output.setError(e);
+ output.setError("An unexpected error occurred.");
+ response.setStatus(HttpServletResponse.SC_INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR); // Set HTTP 500 status code
response.getOutputStream().print(output.toString());
response.setContentType(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON);
response.setContentLength(output.toString().length());
status = false;
}Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| @Autowired | ||
| public void setSessionObject(SessionObject sessionObject) { | ||
| this.sessionObject = sessionObject; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider Using Constructor Injection for SessionObject Dependency
Similarly, applying constructor injection for the SessionObject dependency improves the clarity of mandatory dependencies and enhances the class's immutability.
Modify the class constructor to include SessionObject:
public class HTTPRequestInterceptor implements HandlerInterceptor {
private final Validator validator;
+ private final SessionObject sessionObject;
@Autowired
- public HTTPRequestInterceptor(Validator validator) {
+ public HTTPRequestInterceptor(Validator validator, SessionObject sessionObject) {
this.validator = validator;
+ this.sessionObject = sessionObject;
}
- @Autowired
- public void setSessionObject(SessionObject sessionObject) {
- this.sessionObject = sessionObject;
- }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| @Autowired | |
| public void setSessionObject(SessionObject sessionObject) { | |
| this.sessionObject = sessionObject; | |
| } | |
| @Autowired | |
| public HTTPRequestInterceptor(Validator validator, SessionObject sessionObject) { | |
| this.validator = validator; | |
| this.sessionObject = sessionObject; | |
| } |
src/main/java/com/iemr/helpline104/utils/http/HTTPRequestInterceptor.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
…ceptor.java Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
src/main/java/com/iemr/helpline104/utils/http/HTTPRequestInterceptor.java (2)
Line range hint
111-117: Enhance session handling with proper validation and error handling.The session update logic could be improved in several ways:
- Validate authorization token format before use
- Handle potential null session objects
- Add proper error handling for session updates
Consider updating the code:
String authorization = request.getHeader("Authorization"); -logger.debug("RequestURI::" + request.getRequestURI() + " || Authorization ::" + authorization); if (authorization != null) { + try { + if (!validator.isValidAuthorizationFormat(authorization)) { + logger.warn("Invalid authorization format detected"); + return; + } + Object session = sessionObject.getSessionObject(authorization); + if (session == null) { + logger.warn("No session found for the given authorization"); + return; + } sessionObject.updateSessionObject(authorization, sessionObject.getSessionObject(authorization)); + } catch (Exception e) { + logger.error("Failed to update session", e); } }
Line range hint
43-128: Consider splitting the interceptor into specialized components.The
HTTPRequestInterceptorclass has grown to handle multiple concerns:
- Authentication/Authorization
- Session management
- Request validation
- Error handling
This violates the Single Responsibility Principle and makes the code harder to maintain and test.
Consider splitting this into:
AuthenticationInterceptor: Handle authentication/authorizationSessionManagementInterceptor: Handle session-related operationsValidationInterceptor: Handle request validationErrorHandlingInterceptor: Centralize error handlingThis would allow for:
- Better separation of concerns
- Easier testing
- More flexible configuration
- Improved maintainability
Each interceptor could be conditionally applied to specific endpoints using Spring's interceptor registry configuration.
| switch (requestAPI) { | ||
| case "userAuthenticate": | ||
| case "userAuthenticateNew": | ||
| case "userAuthenticateV1": | ||
| case "forgetPassword": | ||
| case "setForgetPassword": | ||
| case "changePassword": | ||
| case "saveUserSecurityQuesAns": |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider using an enum or configuration for authentication endpoints.
The growing switch statement with hardcoded authentication-related endpoints could become difficult to maintain. Consider moving these endpoints to an enum or configuration file.
Example implementation:
public enum AuthExemptEndpoint {
USER_AUTHENTICATE("userAuthenticate"),
USER_AUTHENTICATE_NEW("userAuthenticateNew"),
USER_AUTHENTICATE_V1("userAuthenticateV1"),
FORGET_PASSWORD("forgetPassword"),
SET_FORGET_PASSWORD("setForgetPassword"),
CHANGE_PASSWORD("changePassword"),
SAVE_SECURITY_QUESTIONS("saveUserSecurityQuesAns");
private final String path;
AuthExemptEndpoint(String path) {
this.path = path;
}
public static boolean isExempt(String path) {
return Arrays.stream(values())
.anyMatch(endpoint -> endpoint.path.equals(path));
}
}…ceptor.java commitable suggestion to convert setter based injection to constructor based injection Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/main/java/com/iemr/helpline104/utils/http/HTTPRequestInterceptor.java (1)
127-128: Remove unnecessary empty linesThe file contains consecutive empty lines at the end. This affects code readability and violates common code style guidelines.
public void afterCompletion(HttpServletRequest request, HttpServletResponse response, Object object, Exception arg3) throws Exception { logger.debug("In afterCompletion Request Completed"); } - - - }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/main/java/com/iemr/helpline104/utils/http/HTTPRequestInterceptor.java(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/main/java/com/iemr/helpline104/utils/http/HTTPRequestInterceptor.java (1)
Line range hint 111-117: Ensure thread-safe session handling
The session object update operation might face race conditions in a concurrent environment. Consider using atomic operations or synchronization mechanisms when updating the session object.
| } | ||
| } catch (Exception e) { | ||
| logger.error(e.getLocalizedMessage()); | ||
|
|
||
| OutputResponse output = new OutputResponse(); | ||
| output.setError(e); | ||
| response.getOutputStream().print(output.toString()); | ||
| response.setContentType(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON); | ||
| response.setContentLength(output.toString().length()); | ||
| response.setHeader("Access-Control-Allow-Origin", "*"); | ||
| status = false; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance error handling with structured logging and response codes
While the basic error handling is in place, consider these additional improvements:
- Add structured logging with error codes
- Include correlation IDs for request tracing
- Use specific HTTP status codes based on error type
} catch (Exception e) {
+ String correlationId = generateCorrelationId(request);
+ logger.error("Request processing failed. correlationId={}, uri={}, error={}",
+ correlationId, request.getRequestURI(), e.getMessage(), e);
OutputResponse output = new OutputResponse();
- output.setError(e);
+ output.setError("Request failed. Reference ID: " + correlationId);
+ int statusCode = determineHttpStatus(e);
+ response.setStatus(statusCode);
response.getOutputStream().print(output.toString());
response.setContentType(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON);
response.setContentLength(output.toString().length());
status = false;
}Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
|
📋 Description
JIRA ID:
AMM-1049 | Unable to connect to Redis. This has been fixed by swapping HttpRequestInterceptor file to older feature/jdk1.8 HttpRequestInterceptor implementation.
✅ Type of Change
ℹ️ Additional Information
Please describe how the changes were tested, and include any relevant screenshots, logs, or other information that provides additional context.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Chores