Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Dynamic Rule Merger Fix #1265

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Aug 27, 2024
Merged

Dynamic Rule Merger Fix #1265

merged 3 commits into from
Aug 27, 2024

Conversation

ankit-privado
Copy link
Contributor

When we merge an external rule with an internal one, it's possible that both merging rules don't have the same ID. In cases where the domain or name matches, we merge the external rule with the internal one, but when tagging the dependency node, we only have the external rule ID. So, it's important to map which external rule was merged with which internal rule.

We have created the DynamicMergerRuleMap to store the merging information.

Copy link
Member

@pandurangpatil pandurangpatil left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me.

@pandurangpatil pandurangpatil merged commit 24aa181 into dev Aug 27, 2024
13 checks passed
@pandurangpatil pandurangpatil deleted the third-party-discovery-fix branch August 27, 2024 04:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants