-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
refactor(x/crosschain): migrate module data #764
Conversation
@coderabbitai review |
✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
WalkthroughThe changes introduce several enhancements to the application's migration management system. A new method for setting migration order has been added, alongside a dedicated function to return the order of migrations. Additionally, multiple modules have undergone updates to their migration logic and consensus versions, reflecting a shift towards a more structured and centralized approach. New functions for removing deprecated store keys have also been implemented, while some deprecated constants and functions have been removed, streamlining the codebase. Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 8
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (7)
x/crosschain/keeper/legacy.go (1)
Line range hint
10-20
: Consider documenting migration path for v8.Given that this function is deprecated and slated for removal in v8, it would be helpful to document the migration path for users of this function. This could include:
- The replacement function or pattern to be used in v8.
- Any necessary steps for users to update their code.
- The rationale behind the deprecation and removal.
This documentation will ease the transition for developers when upgrading to v8.
app/upgrades/store/store.go (1)
9-28
: LGTM: Well-implemented function with a minor suggestion.The
RemoveStoreKeys
function is efficiently implemented:
- It correctly uses the SDK's store and iterator interfaces.
- The nested
deleteFn
encapsulates the deletion logic well.- Logging is appropriately used for monitoring deletions.
Consider adding error handling to manage potential issues during store operations. For example:
if err := ctx.KVStore(storeKey).Iterator(nil, nil).Error(); err != nil { return fmt.Errorf("failed to access store: %w", err) }This would help catch and report any underlying store access issues.
x/crosschain/migrations/v8/migrate.go (2)
10-19
: Enhance deprecation comments for better context.While the comments clearly indicate that these keys are deprecated, it would be helpful to provide more context. Consider adding information about:
- Why these keys are being deprecated.
- What, if anything, replaces their functionality.
- In which version they were or will be removed.
This additional information will help future maintainers understand the evolution of the codebase.
21-32
: Improve deprecation comment for GetTokenToDenomKey function.The GetTokenToDenomKey function is correctly implemented, but its deprecation comment could be more informative. Consider adding:
- The reason for deprecation.
- The version in which it will be or was removed.
- Any replacement function or alternative approach, if applicable.
This will provide better context for future maintainers and users of the codebase.
The GetRemovedStoreKeys function looks good and provides a convenient way to access all deprecated keys.
x/layer2/module.go (1)
Line range hint
1-141
: Summary: Coordinated update of migration and consensus version.The changes in this file are part of a broader update across multiple modules:
- The migration strategy has been updated to use
Migrate7to8
.- The consensus version has been incremented from 2 to 3.
These changes suggest a significant update in the module's logic and migration strategy. Ensure that all dependent modules and documentation are updated accordingly.
Consider adding a changelog entry or updating the module's documentation to reflect these changes, especially the increment in the consensus version, as it may affect module compatibility.
app/app.go (1)
205-205
: LGTM! Consider adding a comment for clarity.The addition of
app.mm.SetOrderMigrations(orderMigrations()...)
is a good practice. It establishes a specific order for module migrations, which is crucial for maintaining consistency during upgrades.Consider adding a brief comment explaining the purpose of this line, e.g.:
// Set the order of migrations app.mm.SetOrderMigrations(orderMigrations()...)This would enhance code readability and make the intention clearer for future developers.
x/crosschain/keeper/migrations.go (1)
23-28
: Avoid using magic numbers forAverageExternalBlockTime
Assigning a magic number directly to
params.AverageExternalBlockTime
can reduce code clarity and maintainability. Consider defining a constant or using a configuration parameter to make the code more understandable and adaptable.Apply this diff to define a constant for the block time:
+const defaultAverageExternalBlockTime = 250 func (m Migrator) Migrate7to8WithArbExternalBlockTime(ctx sdk.Context) error { if err := m.Migrate7to8(ctx); err != nil { return err } params := m.keeper.GetParams(ctx) - params.AverageExternalBlockTime = 250 + params.AverageExternalBlockTime = defaultAverageExternalBlockTime return m.keeper.SetParams(ctx, ¶ms) }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (16)
- app/app.go (1 hunks)
- app/modules.go (1 hunks)
- app/upgrades/store/store.go (1 hunks)
- app/upgrades/v8/upgrade.go (2 hunks)
- x/arbitrum/module.go (2 hunks)
- x/avalanche/module.go (2 hunks)
- x/bsc/module.go (2 hunks)
- x/crosschain/keeper/legacy.go (1 hunks)
- x/crosschain/keeper/migrations.go (2 hunks)
- x/crosschain/migrations/v8/migrate.go (1 hunks)
- x/crosschain/types/key.go (0 hunks)
- x/eth/module.go (2 hunks)
- x/layer2/module.go (2 hunks)
- x/optimism/module.go (2 hunks)
- x/polygon/module.go (2 hunks)
- x/tron/module.go (2 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- x/crosschain/types/key.go
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (27)
x/crosschain/keeper/legacy.go (2)
6-6
: LGTM: Import addition aligns with deprecation plan.The new import for v8 migrations is consistent with the function's deprecation notice and the planned removal in v8.
13-13
: LGTM: Key retrieval updated to v8 version.The change to use
v8.GetTokenToDenomKey
is consistent with the ongoing migration to v8. The function's overall behavior should remain unchanged.To ensure the new key retrieval method behaves as expected, please run the following verification:
✅ Verification successful
LGTM: Key retrieval updated to v8 version.
The new key retrieval method behaves as expected and matches the previous implementation.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the behavior of v8.GetTokenToDenomKey # Test: Check if v8.GetTokenToDenomKey is defined and used correctly ast-grep --pattern 'func GetTokenToDenomKey($denom string) []byte { $$$ }' # Test: Compare the implementation of v8.GetTokenToDenomKey with the previous version rg -A 10 'func GetTokenToDenomKey'Length of output: 756
app/upgrades/store/store.go (2)
1-6
: LGTM: Package declaration and imports are appropriate.The package name 'store' accurately reflects the functionality provided. The imports for
storetypes
andsdk
are correctly aliased and relevant to the function's requirements.
8-8
: LGTM: Function signature is well-designed.The
RemoveStoreKeys
function has a clear, descriptive name and appropriate parameters. The use ofsdk.Context
,storetypes.StoreKey
, and a slice of byte slices for prefixes provides flexibility and aligns with Cosmos SDK conventions.x/crosschain/migrations/v8/migrate.go (2)
1-8
: LGTM: Package declaration and imports are appropriate.The package name and imports are correctly set up for the migration functionality in v8.
1-37
: Overall, the migration implementation looks solid with room for minor improvements.The file successfully implements the necessary functionality for managing deprecated store keys during the v8 migration. The structure is clear, and the functions are well-defined. The suggested improvements mainly focus on enhancing documentation and error handling, which will contribute to better maintainability and robustness of the codebase.
x/tron/module.go (1)
107-109
: LGTM! Verify the implementation ofMigrate7to8
.The update to the migration version and function aligns with changes in other modules, indicating a coordinated update. This change looks good, but it's important to ensure that the
Migrate7to8
function is correctly implemented.Let's verify the implementation of the
Migrate7to8
function:x/polygon/module.go (3)
129-129
: LGTM. Ensure all related updates are in place.The increment of the
ConsensusVersion
from 5 to 6 is consistent with similar updates in other modules. This change suggests a breaking change in the module's state machine logic.Please ensure the following:
- All necessary updates related to this consensus version change have been made throughout the codebase.
- The CHANGELOG and any other relevant documentation have been updated to reflect this change and explain its implications.
- Tests have been updated or added to cover the changes associated with this new consensus version.
To verify related updates, you can run:
#!/bin/bash # Search for other occurrences of consensus version 6 in the codebase rg "ConsensusVersion.*6" # Search for changelog updates rg -i "changelog" | rg -i "consensus.*version.*6"
Line range hint
1-137
: Overall LGTM. Ensure cross-module consistency and documentation.The changes in this file, including the migration version update and consensus version increment, appear to be part of a coordinated update across multiple modules. While the changes themselves look good, it's crucial to ensure consistency across all affected modules and to update documentation accordingly.
To ensure cross-module consistency, please run:
These checks will help verify that the changes are consistently applied across all relevant modules and that documentation has been updated appropriately.
107-109
: LGTM. Verify migration function and update documentation.The migration version update from 4 to 5 and the change to
migrator.Migrate7to8
align with similar updates in other modules. This change appears to be part of a coordinated update across the codebase.Please ensure the following:
- The
Migrate7to8
function in the migrator package is correctly implemented to handle the migration from version 7 to 8 of the module's data structure.- Any relevant documentation (e.g., CHANGELOG, migration guides) has been updated to reflect this change.
To verify the implementation of the
Migrate7to8
function, you can run:x/bsc/module.go (2)
111-113
: LGTM! Verify consistency across modules.The update to the migration version and function aligns with similar changes in other modules (polygon, tron, eth). This change appears to be part of a coordinated update across the application.
To ensure consistency, let's verify that other relevant modules have been updated similarly:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for consistent migration updates across modules # Test: Search for RegisterMigration calls with version 5 and Migrate7to8 echo "Checking for consistent migration updates:" rg --type go 'RegisterMigration.*5.*Migrate7to8'
133-133
: LGTM! Verify rationale for consensus version update.The increment of the consensus version from 5 to 6 is consistent with updates in other modules (polygon, tron, layer2). This change suggests a significant update across modules.
To ensure this update is justified and consistent, let's verify the consensus version across modules and check for any related changes:
Could you provide more context on the rationale for incrementing the consensus version? Are there any breaking changes or significant updates that necessitated this increment?
x/eth/module.go (1)
133-133
: LGTM. Ensure network compatibility and update documentation.The increment of the consensus version from 3 to 4 is in line with similar updates in other modules. This change suggests a significant update in the protocol.
Please ensure the following:
- All nodes in the network are prepared to handle this consensus version change.
- Upgrade guides are updated to reflect this change and any necessary steps for node operators.
- Any downstream dependencies are aware of this consensus version update.
Run the following script to verify the consistency of consensus versions across modules:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for consistency in consensus versions across modules # Test: Search for ConsensusVersion definitions in all module files rg --type go 'func.*ConsensusVersion.*uint64.*return [0-9]+'x/layer2/module.go (1)
133-133
: LGTM. Verify consensus version update across the codebase.The increment of the consensus version from 2 to 3 is in line with similar updates in other modules. This change suggests a significant update in the module's logic.
To ensure the consensus version update is consistent across the codebase, please run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the consensus version update across the codebase # Test: Check for any remaining instances of the old consensus version rg -A 5 'ConsensusVersion\(\) uint64 {\s+return 2' # Test: Verify the new consensus version in other modules rg -A 5 'ConsensusVersion\(\) uint64 {\s+return 3'x/optimism/module.go (2)
133-133
: LGTM. Verify documentation and upgrade handlers.The increment of the consensus version is consistent with changes in other modules. This indicates a breaking change in the module's state machine logic.
Please ensure this change is reflected in relevant documentation and upgrade handlers. Run the following script to check for related references:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for references to the new consensus version # Test: Search for references to the new consensus version in documentation rg -i "consensus.*version.*3|v3" -- "*.md" # Test: Check for upgrade handlers referencing the new version rg -i "upgrade.*handler.*3|v3"
111-113
: LGTM. Verify the migration function implementation.The update to the migration version and function looks good. It aligns with similar changes in other modules, indicating a coordinated update across the codebase.
To ensure the migration function is correctly implemented, please run the following script:
x/avalanche/module.go (2)
Line range hint
1-141
: Summary: Module update aligns with broader codebase changes.The changes in this file, including the update to
RegisterServices
andConsensusVersion
, are part of a coordinated update across multiple modules in the codebase. These modifications suggest a significant evolution in the application's architecture or functionality.Key points:
- Migration process has been updated to version 3, using
Migrate7to8
.- Consensus version has been incremented to 4.
Ensure that these changes are consistently applied across all affected modules and that any dependent components or documentation are updated accordingly.
133-133
: LGTM. Verify consensus version consistency.The increment of the consensus version from 3 to 4 is in line with similar updates in other modules. This change typically indicates significant updates or breaking changes in the module's logic.
Please ensure that this version bump is consistently reflected across the codebase and in any relevant documentation. You can verify this with the following script:
✅ Verification successful
Consensus version update verified.
The
ConsensusVersion
inx/avalanche/module.go
has been successfully incremented to 4. This update is consistent with the versions used in other modules, ensuring compatibility and alignment across the codebase.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify consensus version consistency # Test 1: Search for other occurrences of ConsensusVersion in the codebase rg -A 1 'func \(.+\) ConsensusVersion\(\) uint64' # Test 2: Search for any hardcoded version numbers that might need updating rg 'version.*[34]' --type goLength of output: 23819
app/modules.go (1)
283-323
: LGTM. Verify the migration order with the team.The new
orderMigrations()
function provides a clear and organized way to define the order of module migrations. The order seems logical, starting with core modules and moving to more specific ones. However, it's crucial to ensure that this order is correct and aligns with the dependencies between modules during the migration process.Please run the following script to verify if the
orderMigrations()
function is being used correctly in the migration process:✅ Verification successful
Verified.
The
orderMigrations()
function is properly utilized in the migration process as evidenced by its usage inapp/app.go
. No issues were found with the migration order.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of orderMigrations() in the migration process # Test: Search for the usage of orderMigrations() in the codebase rg -n "orderMigrations\(\)" app/ # Test: Check if SetOrderMigrations is called with the result of orderMigrations() rg -n "SetOrderMigrations\(orderMigrations\(\)" app/Length of output: 270
app/app.go (1)
205-205
: Verify orderMigrations() implementation and upgrade process.While the addition of
SetOrderMigrations
is good, it's important to ensure that theorderMigrations()
function is implemented correctly and that the order of migrations aligns with the module dependencies and upgrade requirements.Please run the following script to check the implementation of
orderMigrations()
:Additionally, consider the following:
- Does the order of migrations align with module dependencies?
- Have you tested this change with a simulated upgrade to ensure it doesn't break the upgrade process?
- Is there documentation that needs to be updated to reflect this change in the migration process?
x/crosschain/keeper/migrations.go (3)
6-6
: Importing the v8 migration packageThe import statement correctly includes the v8 migration package required for the new migration functionalities.
19-21
: Adding theMigrate7to8
methodThe new
Migrate7to8
method effectively delegates the migration process to thev8.Migrate
function, ensuring a clean transition to version 8.
23-28
: Verify the appropriateness ofAverageExternalBlockTime
valueEnsure that setting
AverageExternalBlockTime
to250
accurately reflects the average external block time for Arbitrum. It's important to confirm that this value is correct and consistent with other modules or documentation.Run the following script to check for consistency of
AverageExternalBlockTime
across the codebase:✅ Verification successful
AverageExternalBlockTime value is appropriate for Arbitrum
The value
250
forAverageExternalBlockTime
inx/crosschain/keeper/migrations.go
is consistent withx/arbitrum/types/genesis.go
and accurately reflects Arbitrum's average external block time.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the value of AverageExternalBlockTime is consistent. # Test: Search for all assignments to AverageExternalBlockTime rg 'AverageExternalBlockTime\s*=\s*\d+' -t go # Expect: All assignments should use the same value or appropriately defined constants.Length of output: 798
app/upgrades/v8/upgrade.go (4)
21-21
: Import of 'store' package is appropriateThe addition of the
store
package import is necessary for utilizing thestore.RemoveStoreKeys
function.
45-45
: Use of centralized store key removal enhances maintainabilityReplacing local store key removal logic with
store.RemoveStoreKeys
improves code maintainability by centralizing the functionality.
57-57
: Consistent application of store key removal in ERC20 moduleUsing
store.RemoveStoreKeys
for the ERC20 module aligns with the refactored approach to store management.
67-67
: Appropriate use ofstore.RemoveStoreKeys
in migrationThe invocation of
store.RemoveStoreKeys
withinmigrationGovCustomParam
maintains consistency across migration functions.
func Migrate(ctx sdk.Context, storeKey storetypes.StoreKey) error { | ||
store.RemoveStoreKeys(ctx, storeKey, GetRemovedStoreKeys()) | ||
return nil | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance error handling and logging in Migrate function.
While the Migrate function correctly calls store.RemoveStoreKeys, there are a few areas for improvement:
-
Error Handling: The function always returns nil, potentially hiding errors from RemoveStoreKeys. Consider returning the error from RemoveStoreKeys.
-
Logging: Add logging to track the migration process. This can help with debugging and monitoring.
Here's a suggested improvement:
func Migrate(ctx sdk.Context, storeKey storetypes.StoreKey) error {
removedKeys := GetRemovedStoreKeys()
err := store.RemoveStoreKeys(ctx, storeKey, removedKeys)
if err != nil {
ctx.Logger().Error("Failed to remove deprecated store keys", "error", err)
return err
}
ctx.Logger().Info("Successfully removed deprecated store keys", "count", len(removedKeys))
return nil
}
This version provides better error handling and adds logging for both success and failure scenarios.
@@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ func (am AppModule) ExportGenesis(ctx sdk.Context, cdc codec.JSONCodec) json.Raw | |||
|
|||
// ConsensusVersion implements AppModule/ConsensusVersion. | |||
func (am AppModule) ConsensusVersion() uint64 { | |||
return 5 | |||
return 6 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Codebase verification
Please update the documentation to reflect the new consensus version.
The consensus version has been incremented to 6 in the codebase, but corresponding documentation updates are missing.
- Ensure all relevant documentation includes the updated consensus version.
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM! Update documentation for new consensus version.
The increment of the consensus version from 5 to 6 is consistent with updates in other modules. This change looks good.
Let's verify if the documentation has been updated to reflect this change:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for documentation updates regarding the new consensus version
# Test: Search for mentions of the new consensus version in documentation
rg -p 'consensus.*version.*6' --type md
Length of output: 41
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Broad search for consensus version updates in all documentation files
# Test: Search for various mentions of the new consensus version
rg -i 'consensus.*version.*6' .
Length of output: 816
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for consensus version updates in common documentation directories
# Test: Search within 'docs' and 'documentation' directories
rg -i 'consensus.*version.*6' docs documentation
Length of output: 104
if err := cfg.RegisterMigration(am.Name(), 3, migrator.Migrate7to8); err != nil { | ||
panic(err) | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Codebase verification
Migration Function Migrate7to8
Not Found
The migrator.Migrate7to8
function is registered but its definition does not exist in the codebase. Please implement this migration function or update the registration accordingly.
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM. Verify impact and update documentation.
The migration version update from 2 to 3 and the change to migrator.Migrate7to8
aligns with similar updates in other modules. This change appears to be part of a coordinated update across the codebase.
Please ensure the following:
- All dependent modules are updated to use the new migration version.
- The
Migrate7to8
function is properly implemented in the migrator. - Documentation is updated to reflect this change in migration strategy.
Run the following script to verify the consistency of migration versions across modules:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistency in migration versions across modules
# Test: Search for RegisterMigration calls in all module files
rg --type go 'RegisterMigration.*Migrate.*to.*'
Length of output: 62
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for all RegisterMigration calls and list their migration functions
rg --type go 'RegisterMigration\s*\(\s*[^,]+,\s*\d+,\s*([^)\s]+)\s*\)' --replace '$1' --count-matches
Length of output: 309
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find the definition of migrator.Migrate7to8
rg --type go 'func\s+Migrate7to8\s*\('
Length of output: 40
if err := cfg.RegisterMigration(am.Name(), 2, migrator.Migrate7to8); err != nil { | ||
panic(err) | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Codebase verification
Migration Function Migrate7to8
Missing Implementation
The Migrate7to8
function is referenced in multiple modules but its implementation was not found. Please ensure that it is properly implemented.
x/tron/module.go
x/polygon/module.go
x/optimism/module.go
x/layer2/module.go
x/eth/module.go
x/bsc/module.go
x/avalanche/module.go
x/arbitrum/module.go
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM. Verify the migration function implementation.
The update to use migrator.Migrate7to8
aligns with similar changes in other modules. This suggests a coordinated update across the application.
To ensure the migration function is correctly implemented, please run the following script:
Action Required: Update and rerun verification scripts for Migrate7to8
function.
To ensure accurate verification, please execute the following corrected shell scripts:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the implementation of Migrate7to8 function
# Test: Check if Migrate7to8 function exists in the migrator
ast-grep --pattern 'func (Migrator) Migrate7to8(sdk.Context) error'
# Test: Verify usage of Migrate7to8 in other modules
rg -A 5 'migrator.Migrate7to8'
Length of output: 409
Script:
#
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the implementation and usage of Migrate7to8 function
# Test: Check if Migrate7to8 function exists in the migrator
ast-grep --pattern 'func \(Migrator\) Migrate7to8\(sdk\.Context\) error' .
# Test: Verify usage of Migrate7to8 in other modules
rg -A 5 'migrator\.Migrate7to8' .
Length of output: 2685
if err := cfg.RegisterMigration(am.Name(), 3, migrator.Migrate7to8); err != nil { | ||
panic(err) | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Codebase verification
Migrate7to8
Function Not Implemented
The Migrate7to8
function is missing in x/avalanche/module.go
. Please implement this function to handle the migration from version 7 to 8.
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM. Verify migration function implementation.
The update to use migrator.Migrate7to8
and increment the migration version is consistent with changes in other modules. This change suggests a significant update in the module's data structure or logic.
Please ensure that the Migrate7to8
function in the migrator is correctly implemented to handle the migration from version 7 to 8. You can verify this with the following script:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the implementation of Migrate7to8 function
# Test: Search for the Migrate7to8 function definition
rg -A 10 'func \(Migrator\) Migrate7to8'
Length of output: 23819
func (m Migrator) Migrate7to8WithArbExternalBlockTime(ctx sdk.Context) error { | ||
if err := m.Migrate7to8(ctx); err != nil { | ||
return err | ||
} | ||
params.EnableSendToExternalPending = enablePending | ||
params.EnableBridgeCallPending = enablePending | ||
|
||
params := m.keeper.GetParams(ctx) | ||
params.AverageExternalBlockTime = 250 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider making AverageExternalBlockTime
configurable
Hardcoding AverageExternalBlockTime
may limit flexibility in different environments or future updates. Making this value configurable through parameters or configuration files can enhance adaptability and ease of maintenance.
if err := cfg.RegisterMigration(am.Name(), 2, migrator.Migrate7to8WithArbExternalBlockTime); err != nil { | ||
panic(err) | ||
} | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Handle errors without panicking to improve stability
In the RegisterServices
function, using panic
on error can lead to unexpected crashes. It's better to handle the error gracefully to enhance the module's robustness.
Apply this diff to return the error instead of panicking:
if err := cfg.RegisterMigration(am.Name(), 2, migrator.Migrate7to8WithArbExternalBlockTime); err != nil {
- panic(err)
+ // Return the error to be handled by the caller
+ return err
}
Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
@@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ func (am AppModule) ExportGenesis(ctx sdk.Context, cdc codec.JSONCodec) json.Raw | |||
|
|||
// ConsensusVersion implements AppModule/ConsensusVersion. | |||
func (am AppModule) ConsensusVersion() uint64 { | |||
return 2 | |||
return 3 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Codebase verification
Migration Registration Mismatch Detected
The ConsensusVersion
is set to 3
, but the registered migration for version 2
uses a function (Migrate7to8WithArbExternalBlockTime
) that suggests migrating from version 7
to 8
. This indicates that migrations from version 2
to 3
might be missing or incorrectly implemented.
🔗 Analysis chain
Ensure consistency between migration versions
The ConsensusVersion
method returns 3
, indicating the module's current version. However, you're registering a migration from version 2
. Verify that all necessary migrations from version 2
to 3
are properly handled.
Run the following script to list all registered migrations for the module:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify registered migrations for the arbitrum module.
# Expected: Should list migrations including from version 2 to 3.
rg 'RegisterMigration\(' -A 2 --multiline --glob 'x/arbitrum/*.go'
Length of output: 254
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify if migration from version 2 to 3 is registered for the arbitrum module.
ast-grep --pattern $'cfg.RegisterMigration($_, 2, $_)' --glob 'x/arbitrum/*.go'
Length of output: 322
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify if migration from version 2 to 3 is registered for the arbitrum module.
ast-grep --pattern $'cfg.RegisterMigration($_, 2, $_)' --globs 'x/arbitrum/*.go'
Length of output: 213
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Updates
Bug Fixes