Integrate workflow.pacta analysis in dashboard generation

[AlexAxthelm]

No description provided.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 41 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 0.00%. Comparing base (0ec48f2) to head (c0c6807).
Report is 25 commits behind head on feat/34-enable-parameter-parsing.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
R/run_dashboard_workflow.R	0.00%	41 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@                       Coverage Diff                        @@
##           feat/34-enable-parameter-parsing     #49   +/-   ##
================================================================
  Coverage                              0.00%   0.00%           
================================================================
  Files                                    23      24    +1     
  Lines                                  1110    1151   +41     
================================================================
- Misses                                 1110    1151   +41     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[github-actions]

Docker build status

commit_time	git_sha	image
2024-12-13T13:52:04Z	c0c6807	ghcr.io/rmi-pacta/workflow.pacta.dashboard:feat-34-enable-parameter-parsing

[github-actions]

PR Preview Action v1.4.8
Preview removed because the pull request was closed.
2024-12-13 14:01 UTC

[jdhoffa]

PR Preview Action v1.4.8
🚀 Deployed preview to https://RMI-PACTA.github.io/workflow.pacta.dashboard/pr-preview/pr-49/
on branch gh-pages at 2024-12-13 11:46 UTC

This is so awesome!

Just noting that for:
default_2023Q4
and
full_params_2023Q4

The portfolio-level technology mix plots don't appear:

Interestingly, this seems to also be the case for our test CI on worklow.pacta.webapp:
See: RMI-PACTA/workflow.pacta.webapp#27

For example:
default_2023Q4

full_params_2023Q4

[jdhoffa]

Interestingly, this seems to also be the case for our test CI on worklow.pacta.webapp: See: RMI-PACTA/workflow.pacta.webapp#27

@AlexAxthelm This leads me to believe that this is an artifact of the test data (or something else) and not directly related to this PR, so not-blocking.

I will look into the data side, and you can keep on with this 😊

[jdhoffa]

I will look into the data side, and you can keep on with this 😊

Reproduced locally.

[jdhoffa]

I will look into the data side, and you can keep on with this 😊

Reproduced locally.

The bug if that the selected selectscenario values for 2023Q4 point to 2022 scenarios:

Browse[1]> select_scenario_other
[1] "GECO2022_1.5C"
Browse[1]> select_scenario
[1] "WEO2022_NZE_2050"

I will review all configs across workflow.pacta.report, workflow.pacta.webapp and workflow.pacta.dashboard and fix that.

[jdhoffa]

I will look into the data side, and you can keep on with this 😊

Reproduced locally.

The bug if that the selected selectscenario values for 2023Q4 point to 2022 scenarios:

Browse[1]> select_scenario_other
[1] "GECO2022_1.5C"
Browse[1]> select_scenario
[1] "WEO2022_NZE_2050"

I will review all configs across workflow.pacta.report, workflow.pacta.webapp and workflow.pacta.dashboard and fix that.

Should be resolved by:
RMI-PACTA/workflow.pacta.report#36
RMI-PACTA/workflow.pacta.webapp#28
f1c86b8
https://github.com/RMI-PACTA/workflow.pacta.dashboard/pull/47/files#r1883841078

[AlexAxthelm]

Merging this PR into #47