-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Audit only entrypoint #107
Conversation
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #107 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 18.35% 18.00% -0.35%
==========================================
Files 4 4
Lines 414 422 +8
==========================================
Hits 76 76
- Misses 338 346 +8 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Docker build status
|
@AlexAxthelm I don't think this will work with https://github.com/RMI-PACTA/workflow.pacta.webapp/pull/32/files In https://github.com/RMI-PACTA/workflow.pacta.webapp/pull/32/files, we are calling the function |
following merge of RMI-PACTA/workflow.pacta#107
* gains `run_analysis` script * only run analysis if necessary * Revert "only run analysis if necessary" This reverts commit dcc7f35. * bump version * Rename file * Use dev version of `workflow.pacta` access to new `run_audit` flag * Add audit-only test step * Fix: line continuation * Use simple shell script as entrypoint * Change permissions on shell script * Don't pass all args, (just the first) to entrypoint * Add Dockerignore * POint entrypoint to correct R script * Trigger CI with cache bust on DESCRIPTION * Add run_audit flag to `run_webapp_workflow` * Render Docs * INclude `workflow.pacta.report` in inherit path * Revert to main branch of dependency following merge of RMI-PACTA/workflow.pacta#107 --------- Co-authored-by: Alex Axthelm <[email protected]>
minimal version of #106, which does not include changes to JSON schema