Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make SccProxy method responsible for handling the SCC request response #1234

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 3, 2024

Conversation

jesusbv
Copy link
Collaborator

@jesusbv jesusbv commented Oct 2, 2024

Description

When calling SccProxy scc_activate_product method, the response should be handled in that method as well

This helps reducing duplication and better responsibility separation

Also, new method to announce hybrid system to SCC

Update tests to reflect the changes

How to test

Activate a product from RMT to SCC , it should work as before

Change Type

Please select the correct option.

  • Bug Fix (a non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New Feature (a non-breaking change which adds new functionality)
  • Documentation Update (a change which only updates documentation)

Checklist

Please check off each item if the requirement is met.

  • I have reviewed my own code and believe that it's ready for an external review.
  • I have provided comments for any hard-to-understand code.
  • I have documented the MANUAL.md file with any changes to the user experience.
  • If my changes are non-trivial, I have added a changelog entry to notify users at package/obs/rmt-server.changes.

Review

Please check out our review guidelines
and get in touch with the author to get a shared understanding of the change.

@jesusbv jesusbv requested review from bear454 and digitaltom October 2, 2024 15:49
@jesusbv jesusbv self-assigned this Oct 2, 2024
When calling SccProxy scc_activate_product method, the response
should be handled in that method as well

This helps reducing duplication and better responsibility separation

Also, new method to announce hybrid system to SCC

Update tests to reflect the changes
@jesusbv jesusbv force-pushed the sccproxy-responsible-scc-request branch from 71729d5 to d4be4b4 Compare October 2, 2024 15:53
Copy link
Member

@bear454 bear454 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@jesusbv jesusbv merged commit 576d488 into master Oct 3, 2024
3 checks passed
@jesusbv jesusbv deleted the sccproxy-responsible-scc-request branch October 3, 2024 09:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants