-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 42
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add Gauss Newton and make LM work for NLS Problems #207
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #207 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 94.42% 93.55% -0.87%
==========================================
Files 7 8 +1
Lines 699 698 -1
==========================================
- Hits 660 653 -7
- Misses 39 45 +6
📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more |
Should LeastSquaresProblem be its own problem type? |
That's actually a good point. I was thinking about this from a correctness standpoint. Currently if using a Nonlinear Solver for NLS, we will directly hit SteadyStateAdjoint which is clearly incorrect. |
Also, a LeastSquaresProblem could use other methods like Optimization.jl stuff. So it just seems like a prudent way to handle it. We should make Levenburg-Marquedt specialize on it too. Worth an issue, etc. |
Bumps [actions/checkout](https://github.com/actions/checkout) from 3 to 4. - [Release notes](https://github.com/actions/checkout/releases) - [Changelog](https://github.com/actions/checkout/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md) - [Commits](actions/checkout@v3...v4) --- updated-dependencies: - dependency-name: actions/checkout dependency-type: direct:production update-type: version-update:semver-major ... Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]>
Damn it. Messed up the history. I will open a new PR |
Don't merge it before #203