-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 174
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update README.md #350
Update README.md #350
Conversation
Fix for Windows OS to verify Binaries
``` | ||
CertUtil -hashfile seedsigner.0.6.0.sha256 SHA256 | findstr /v "hash" | ||
seedsigner_os.0.6.x[].img: OK |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ack
@@ -201,19 +201,19 @@ Now that you have confirmed that you do have the real SeedSigner Project's Publi | |||
``` | |||
shasum -a 256 --ignore-missing --check seedsigner.0.6.*.sha256 | |||
``` | |||
|
|||
**On Windows (inside Powershell):** Run this command | |||
Wait up to 30 seconds for the command to complete, and it should display: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this line can now be removed as the 0.6.x hash calculation is instant. See my comment below on moving downwards, however .
``` | ||
seedsigner_os.0.6.x[Your_Pi_Model_For_Example:pi02w].img: OK | ||
CertUtil -hashfile seedsigner_os.0.6.0.[Your_Pi_Model_For_Example:pi02w].img SHA256 | findstr /v "hash" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I suspect the reason for this PR moving the OSX/Linux "result" section upwards is becuasethe windows section is longer and it is not clear where the Linux section ends and which step is thius next. (We have limited formatting options in Markdown. not even font colors.)
however, there is going to be another PR created in the next few days to make the complete windows hash value checking a single command. without the current 2nd manual step. and so almost like the shamsum command.
So, I suggest to leave this windows command's vertical position unchanged until we have that replacement windows PR merged.
It would also be inconsistent with the other document sections that do the OS commands, and then show the common result description and next steps.
I do agree however that windows is looking like the poor cousin here, but I have draft code using the modern GetFileHash to correct that.
Marcel , thank you very much for your PR. Its does correctly note that the OSX/Linux and Windows sections do not indicate their conclusion very clearly and I agree that it is confusing where to go next. Our formatting options in MD lang are very limited unfortunately. My concern with the change overall is that It would also be inconsistent with the other document sections that do the differnt OS commands, and thereafter show the common result description and next steps. combined to keep the readme as short as possible. I do agree however that windows is looking like the poor cousin here, but I have draft code using the modern GetFileHash to correct that. Perhaps you will participate in the review of that revised layout when its up for review in a few days time? Marc. |
@marcelinho21 can you please weigh in on #352 which I just submitted. The new powershell command could be made into a single, long 1-liner, but I would be hesitant to run script I dont somewhat understand on my own machine. (But of course I definately have done that , in a frustrated moment! 😉) |
@SeedSigner can you please close this PR. I no longer have access to this account. |
Fix for Windows OS guide to verify SeedSigner OS binaries