Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merge pull request #1 from UWPCE-PythonCert/master #2

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Merge pull request #1 from UWPCE-PythonCert/master #2

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

gabrielx52
Copy link

update

@gabrielx52 gabrielx52 closed this Apr 27, 2016
@gabrielx52 gabrielx52 reopened this Apr 27, 2016
@gabrielx52
Copy link
Author

merge

@gabrielx52 gabrielx52 closed this Apr 27, 2016
@gabrielx52
Copy link
Author

merge

@gabrielx52 gabrielx52 reopened this Apr 27, 2016
@gabrielx52
Copy link
Author

merge

@gabrielx52 gabrielx52 closed this Apr 27, 2016
@PythonCHB
Copy link
Contributor

Gabriel,

Did you have some changes you wanted to merge in? (typos, suggestions,
etc...) or was this all a mistake :-)

-CHB

On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 5:59 PM, Gabriel Meringolo <[email protected]

wrote:

update

You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:

#2
Commit Summary

File Changes

Patch Links:


You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#2

Christopher Barker, PhD

Python Language Consulting

  • Teaching
  • Scientific Software Development
  • Desktop GUI and Web Development
  • wxPython, numpy, scipy, Cython

@gabrielx52
Copy link
Author

This was a mistake, I was attempting to sync my fork with the updates in the original.

On Apr 28, 2016, at 11:52 AM, "Christopher H.Barker, PhD" [email protected] wrote:

Gabriel,

Did you have some changes you wanted to merge in? (typos, suggestions,
etc...) or was this all a mistake :-)

-CHB

On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 5:59 PM, Gabriel Meringolo <[email protected]

wrote:

update

You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:

#2
Commit Summary

File Changes

Patch Links:


You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#2

Christopher Barker, PhD

Python Language Consulting

  • Teaching
  • Scientific Software Development
  • Desktop GUI and Web Development
  • wxPython, numpy, scipy, Cython

    You are receiving this because you modified the open/close state.
    Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub

@PythonCHB
Copy link
Contributor

no problem -- just wondering.....

On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 12:26 PM, Gabriel Meringolo <
[email protected]> wrote:

This was a mistake, I was attempting to sync my fork with the updates in
the original.

On Apr 28, 2016, at 11:52 AM, "Christopher H.Barker, PhD" <
[email protected]> wrote:

Gabriel,

Did you have some changes you wanted to merge in? (typos, suggestions,
etc...) or was this all a mistake :-)

-CHB

On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 5:59 PM, Gabriel Meringolo <
[email protected]

wrote:

update

You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:

#2
Commit Summary

File Changes

Patch Links:


You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#2

Christopher Barker, PhD

Python Language Consulting

  • Teaching
  • Scientific Software Development
  • Desktop GUI and Web Development
  • wxPython, numpy, scipy, Cython

    You are receiving this because you modified the open/close state.
    Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub


You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#2 (comment)

Christopher Barker, PhD

Python Language Consulting

  • Teaching
  • Scientific Software Development
  • Desktop GUI and Web Development
  • wxPython, numpy, scipy, Cython

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants