Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix form validation with equal and in operator for adding expression with group to filter #2750
Fix form validation with equal and in operator for adding expression with group to filter #2750
Changes from 2 commits
4af77bb
f33204c
e045c42
4a61445
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You could do early returns. If you plan one for every operator_type this order is good, since EQUALS and IN are the most common (exists for the most match_fields).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If there are other cases of match_fields behaving oddly you can split out handling of those too, like for ip-addresses. Isolate 'em!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The odd ones are "ip_address", "severity" and "sysname". "sysname" can do partial string matching, "severity" does numerical comparison. They're both candidates for their own methods.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It does look to me that the actual cleaning for "sysname" and "severity" will look identical to EQUALS. If you do an early return after IN you could remove the "if" for EQUALS and just do
value = value[0]
. "severity" might need casting toint
but that should be it!