Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Run tests on schedule (daily) #2953

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 23, 2024

Conversation

johannaengland
Copy link
Contributor

To make sure that all dependencies still work. We already build the docker image daily, but as we've seen with snmpsim (#2946) that was not enough.

To make sure that all dependencies still work
@johannaengland johannaengland self-assigned this Aug 19, 2024
@johannaengland johannaengland removed the request for review from podliashanyk August 19, 2024 12:34
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 19, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 56.35%. Comparing base (ea42b94) to head (cafaf10).
Report is 499 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #2953   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   56.35%   56.35%           
=======================================
  Files         603      603           
  Lines       43849    43849           
  Branches       48       48           
=======================================
  Hits        24713    24713           
  Misses      19124    19124           
  Partials       12       12           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.


🚨 Try these New Features:

@lunkwill42 lunkwill42 merged commit d3381e9 into Uninett:master Aug 23, 2024
11 of 12 checks passed
@johannaengland johannaengland deleted the workflows/run-tests-daily branch September 18, 2024 05:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants