Naked delegates should have event modifier keyword #3137
Labels
stat:awaiting triage
Status - Awaiting triage from the Netcode team.
type:feedback
Issue contains feedback and not specific bug or feature requests.
com.unity.netcode.gameobjects/com.unity.netcode.gameobjects/Runtime/NetworkVariable/NetworkVariable.cs
Line 23 in dcaeef9
Delegate events like the one shown above should have
event
keyword modifiers.A "naked" delegate refers to a delegate that is declared without the
event
keyword. This means the delegate is exposed directly, allowing external code to not only subscribe and unsubscribe to it but also to reassign or invoke it directly. This can lead to unintended side effects and potential bugs.For example, in the provided code snippet, the delegates are correctly declared as events:
If these were declared as naked delegates, they would look like this:
Issues with naked delegates:
Reassignment: External code can reassign the delegate, potentially removing all existing subscribers.
Invocation: It breaks encapsulation, making it harder to control how and when the delegate is invoked.
Dangling Pointers: Events in C# are multicast delegates which can have multiple and anonymous methods subscribe to the same event. Using the event keyword will help properly manage those subscriptions and unsubscriptions. This way if someone forgets to unsubscribe, the dangling pointer will get properly cleaned up by garbage collector.
TR;DL:
I've seen this throughout the whole codebase and highly encourage the use of the
event
keyword for all usages of delegate callbacks.Using the
event
keyword ensures that the delegate can only be invoked from within the class that declares it, maintaining proper encapsulation and control over the event's lifecycle and avoiding memory pressure from forgetting to unassign the delegates after use.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: