Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Unifies PUVSPR.dat info source from (geo)FeatureAmounts table [MRXN23-469] #1560

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 26, 2023

Conversation

KevSanchez
Copy link
Collaborator

Substitute this line for a meaningful title for your changes

Overview

Please write a description. If the PR is hard to understand, provide a quick explanation of the code.

Designs

Link to the related design prototypes (if applicable)

Testing instructions

Please explain how to test the PR: ID of a dataset, steps to reach the feature, etc.

Feature relevant tickets

Link to the related task manager tickets


Checklist before submitting

  • Meaningful commits and code rebased on develop.
  • If this PR adds feature that should be tested for regressions when
    deploying to staging/production, please add brief testing instructions
    to the deploy checklist (docs/deployment-checklist.md)
  • Update CHANGELOG file

@KevSanchez KevSanchez requested a review from hotzevzl October 25, 2023 15:11
@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Oct 25, 2023

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
marxan ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Oct 26, 2023 11:09am

@hotzevzl hotzevzl force-pushed the feature/api/MRXN23-469-unify-puvspr-dat-sources branch from db2a838 to 14c77f9 Compare October 26, 2023 11:04
@KevSanchez KevSanchez merged commit 53b4a62 into develop Oct 26, 2023
61 checks passed
@KevSanchez KevSanchez deleted the feature/api/MRXN23-469-unify-puvspr-dat-sources branch October 26, 2023 14:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants