Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

check for configured debugger before start to provide a nicer error message #401

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 7, 2024

Conversation

GitMensch
Copy link
Collaborator

This is a side issue to #398 (I'd like to provide a similar PR for that).

As I'm currently only "on the browser" I have neither tested that nor run prettier, but I think the current state is enough for a first review.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jun 6, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch coverage has no change and project coverage change: -0.35 ⚠️

Comparison is base (26d7d9f) 21.30% compared to head (28634f5) 20.95%.

❗ Your organization is not using the GitHub App Integration. As a result you may experience degraded service beginning May 15th. Please install the Github App Integration for your organization. Read more.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #401      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   21.30%   20.95%   -0.35%     
==========================================
  Files          14       14              
  Lines        1737     1766      +29     
  Branches      375      382       +7     
==========================================
  Hits          370      370              
- Misses       1322     1351      +29     
  Partials       45       45              
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/gdb.ts 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
src/lldb.ts 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
src/mago.ts 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
src/mibase.ts 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@GitMensch
Copy link
Collaborator Author

That change is easy to test, so those should be added before pulling, too.

@GitMensch
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@WebFreak001 Should I rebase - or isn't this likely to get merged?

@WebFreak001
Copy link
Owner

feel free to merge your own commits as well, I think error message improvements and such are always very useful

@GitMensch GitMensch merged commit 9ecddaa into master Feb 7, 2024
8 of 10 checks passed
@GitMensch GitMensch deleted the check-debugger branch February 7, 2024 13:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants