Fixed Rspec Checks Failure of assigned_articles_spec.rb

[PR4NJ41]

What this PR does

This PR fixes Rspec checks failure which were failing due to assigned_articles_spec.rb file.

Addresses Issue #5652

Screenshots

Before:

After:

[PR4NJ41]

@ragesoss
Here is the Preview:

After.mp4

[ragesoss]

This looks like it simply removes the check for the expected article, so that if .has_content? returns false it doesn't matter and the test continues... whereas the expect line also relies on Capybara to wait a certain amount of time and continue checking for the content, so it ensure that the assigned articles list has rendered before moving on. I don't think will make it more reliable.

[PR4NJ41]

Oh, I thought that the has_content waits till it is fully rendered.

[ragesoss]

The test usually passes, so if you weren't able to replicate the failure locally, I suspect that this won't improve the test.

[ragesoss]

I'm not certain about how page.has_content? works, but have_content automatically waits and continues checking the page (up to a certain amount of time) until the expected content is found, so there's no need for the wait argument here.

[ragesoss]

Note that this spec still failed on CI for this PR.

[PR4NJ41]

@ragesoss The have_content is not waiting long enough to load the page. This page takes time to load depending on the server. So if the page has not loaded yet it will throw error of not found. To fix this i added wait, this will force it to wait for sometime to load.

[ragesoss]

Hmm... the default wait time is pretty long; what makes you think that waiting even longer is the solution? Why does it sometimes take that long to load? My guess was that when it fails, it's not because of being slow to render, but that something else went wrong such as a request that failed or didn't return the expected data. But I guess that manual_update can take a while. The solution might instead be to adjust the test setup so that a potentially slow manual update is not needed.

[ragesoss]

That 'manual_update' speculation is relevant for another flaky spec, but not this one. But it still seems related to too-slow network requests that rely on external services. I think the right fix is probably to identify the slow request, and then stub it (with a new method in request_helpers.rb) so that the test can run quickly without actually hitting the slow API.