-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Block Bindings: Remove unneeded 'setAttributes' override #58806
Conversation
The following accounts have interacted with this PR and/or linked issues. I will continue to update these lists as activity occurs. You can also manually ask me to refresh this list by adding the Core SVNCore Committers: Use this line as a base for the props when committing in SVN:
GitHub Merge commitsIf you're merging code through a pull request on GitHub, copy and paste the following into the bottom of the merge commit message.
To understand the WordPress project's expectations around crediting contributors, please review the Contributor Attribution page in the Core Handbook. |
Size Change: -32 B (0%) Total Size: 1.71 MB
ℹ️ View Unchanged
|
@@ -36,8 +36,7 @@ const createEditFunctionWithBindingsAttribute = () => | |||
const { getBlockBindingsSource } = unlock( | |||
useSelect( blockEditorStore ) | |||
); | |||
const { getBlockAttributes, updateBlockAttributes } = | |||
useSelect( blockEditorStore ); | |||
const { getBlockAttributes } = useSelect( blockEditorStore ); | |||
|
|||
const updatedAttributes = getBlockAttributes( clientId ); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why are we calling a selector during render here? Btw I think we have access to the attributes through props.attributes
, so we can shallow clone that?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Btw down below we are mutating the attributes object directly in the store? 🤔
updatedAttributes[ attributeName ] =
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good point.
We can make a few more improvements here, but I'm not familiar enough with the future to confidently make them. So, I decided to stick with changes that won't affect anything.
Suggested improvements:
- No need to use
useBlockEditContext
. All required data should be available viaprops
. - Clone attributes from
props.attributes
. - Return early if there are no bindings.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for sharing the feedback! Actually, I wanted to review that part because in a recent experiment I realized it could be improved as you suggest: link. There, I'm getting the data via props
and mutating the attributes in a different way.
Do you think that approach would be better?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sweet! Can you share the PR link? We can continue our discussion there.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry I forgot that! Here is the PR: link.
It is just an initial experiment that hasn't been tested and needs to be improved. I was considering reusing just the attributesWithBindings
part and creating another pull request only with that if we consider it better than the current approach.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the PR! I believe we can merge this one and address this feedback in a follow-up because I think it is not related to these changes but to the original implementation.
Sounds good, @SantosGuillamot! |
What?
PR removes unnecessary (for the moment)
setAttributes
override for Block Bindings API.Why?
See #58085 (comment).
Testing Instructions
Use testing instructions - #58085.