added PDAL loading/saving with dimension retention

[nvandamme]

#4

[Yarroudh]

Hello @nvandamme,
Thanks for the enhancements you added, this is very useful. I'll review your pull request very soon.

[Yarroudh]

Hello @nvandamme, I would like to know if you have ran any tests with the different formats you added?

[nvandamme]

Hi, only with ply and las/z, as i was focusing on these two. Maybe there are some specific options for otherS, especially e57, though I've followed the base PDAL docs for either know dimensions and outputs options for retaining these... My main focus was to specificaly able to retain any abstracts dimensions (scalar fields) already included in any input point cloud.

…

--- Nicolas Vandamme | CEO/CTO +352 621 41 86 07 +33 642 736 677 ***@***.*** PGP Public Key ID : 7CABEC0D1973B4B8154DDA462DD266DECCC1C375<https://keys.openpgp.org/vks/v1/by-fingerprint/7CABEC0D1973B4B8154DDA462DD266DECCC1C375> FIRIS SA | LU27948222 | RCS Luxembourg B 200097 9 rue du Laboratoire| L-1911 Luxembourg | LUXEMBOURG

________________________________ From: Anass Yarroudh ***@***.***> Sent: Monday, July 10, 2023 8:28:55 PM To: Yarroudh/segment-lidar ***@***.***> Cc: Nicolas Vandamme ***@***.***>; Mention ***@***.***> Subject: Re: [Yarroudh/segment-lidar] added PDAL loading/saving with dimension retention (PR #6) Hello @nvandamme<https://github.com/nvandamme>, I would like to know if you have ran any tests with the different formats you added? — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#6 (comment)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AABRIYMWEFF5ZJ6RZKJRHILXPRCWPANCNFSM6AAAAAAZ3W3DRM>. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[Yarroudh]

The package was updated to a new version. I did not have the time to review your PR, especially that you did not run any tests with other formats. If you want always to contribute, you can adapt your changes to the new version of segment-lidar to resolve conflicts.