Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: consistent std::int32_t in AdaptiveGridTrackDensity #3933

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 3, 2024

Conversation

AJPfleger
Copy link
Contributor

@AJPfleger AJPfleger commented Dec 2, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Improved type consistency for the getBin method in the Adaptive Grid Track Density class, ensuring reliable bin calculations.

This change enhances the overall stability of the feature without altering its functionality.

@AJPfleger AJPfleger added this to the next milestone Dec 2, 2024
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 2, 2024

Walkthrough

A modification in the AdaptiveGridTrackDensity class has occurred, specifically in the getBin method. The return type has shifted from int to std::int32_t, promoting type consistency within the codebase. This change aligns the method's return type with the class's use of fixed-width integer types for bin calculations. No other functional or structural changes were made.

Changes

File Change Summary
Core/src/Vertexing/AdaptiveGridTrackDensity.cpp Return type of getBin method changed from int to std::int32_t

Poem

In the code, a change so slight,
A type adjusted, now feels right.
From int to std::int32_t it flows,
Consistency in bins, how it grows!
A Jedi's touch, in every line,
Code refined, and all align! 🌌✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4a506f8 and 87e6d0f.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • Core/src/Vertexing/AdaptiveGridTrackDensity.cpp (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
Core/src/Vertexing/AdaptiveGridTrackDensity.cpp (1)

46-46: Hmmmm, consistent with the Force, this change is!

A wise choice, using std::int32_t throughout the codebase is. Consistency in integer types, brings balance to the Force, it does.

Verify the consistency of integer types in related methods, we must:

✅ Verification successful

Correct and consistent, this change is!

In both implementation and header files, std::int32_t for bin calculations, used consistently it is. The Force reveals:

  • In header file, Bin type uses std::int32_t for both components, it does
  • In implementation file, getBin function returns std::int32_t, it does
  • Throughout the codebase, fixed-width integer types for bin calculations, maintained they are

No disturbance in the Force, I sense. The type consistency, strong with this one it is!

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for other int32_t usages in the class
rg "std::int32_t" Core/src/Vertexing/AdaptiveGridTrackDensity

# Search for remaining raw int usages that might need conversion
rg "\bint\b" Core/src/Vertexing/AdaptiveGridTrackDensity

Length of output: 288


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for the correct path first using fd
fd -t f "AdaptiveGridTrackDensity" .

# After finding the file, let's check its content
fd -t f "AdaptiveGridTrackDensity" . --exec cat {}

# Search for header files too
fd -t f "AdaptiveGridTrackDensity.hpp" .

Length of output: 48941


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added Component - Core Affects the Core module Vertexing labels Dec 2, 2024
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 2, 2024

📊: Physics performance monitoring for f92a728

Full contents

physmon summary

@AJPfleger AJPfleger marked this pull request as ready for review December 2, 2024 21:01
@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot merged commit cb5bfbe into acts-project:main Dec 3, 2024
48 checks passed
@AJPfleger AJPfleger deleted the int32 branch December 3, 2024 15:50
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the automerge label Dec 3, 2024
@paulgessinger paulgessinger modified the milestones: next, v38.1.0 Dec 6, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Component - Core Affects the Core module Vertexing
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants